不同脱水速率对木奶果种子脱水敏感性及抗氧化酶活性的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1143.2010.10039

Plant Diversity ›› 2010, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 361-366.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1143.2010.10039

不同脱水速率对木奶果种子脱水敏感性及抗氧化酶活性的影响

路信1,2，罗银玲1, 3，王一帆1，兰芹英1

1 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园热带森林生态学重点实验室，云南勐腊666303；2 云南大学生命科学学院，
云南昆明650091；3 思茅师范高等专科学校生命科学系，云南普洱666500

收稿日期:2010-02-24 出版日期:2010-08-25 发布日期:2010-04-19
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程（KSCXZSW117）；科学院战略资源支撑体系－热带植物种质资源的收集保存（CZBZX1）；科技部平台项目－部分热带植物种质资源的整理、整合和信息化（2005DKA21006）

Effect of Different Drying Rates on the Desiccation Tolerance and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Baccaurea ramilfora (Euphorbiaceae) Seeds

LU Xin-1,2, LUO Yin-Ling-1,3, WANG Yi-Fan-1, LAN Qin-Ying-1

1 Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China; 2 School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; 3 Life Science Department, Simao Teacher′s College, Puer 665000, China

Received:2010-02-24 Online:2010-08-25 Published:2010-04-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究了脱水速率对木奶果种子脱水敏感性和抗氧化酶活性的影响。木奶果种子初始含水量高达172 g H2O·g1 DW，萌发率为8667%。含水量降至 090 g H2O·g1 DW 左右时，慢速脱水种子的萌发率为 9778%，而快速脱水的种子萌发率仅为 6444%。快速脱水至含水量为076 g H2O·g1 DW时萌发率为 2167%，而慢速脱水至068 g H2O·g1 DW 时，萌发率仍高达 5556%。确定了木奶果种子是对慢速脱水耐受性更高的顽拗性种子。在种子脱水过程中，相对电解质渗透速率和脂质过氧化产物（TBARs）都呈升高趋势，但慢速脱水后的种子，其TBARs升高的速率较快速脱水的慢。快速脱水的种子中超氧化岐化酶（SOD）、脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶（DHAR）和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶（APX）的活性较慢速脱水的高，而过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性较慢速脱水的低，未检测出谷胱甘肽还原酶（GR）的活性。这些结果表明，在木奶果种子脱水耐性获得过程中过氧化氢酶比其他抗氧化酶作用更大。

关键词: 木奶果, 脱水速率, 抗氧化酶, 膜质过氧化, 脱水敏感性

Abstract:

The effects of different drying rate on desiccation tolerance and ntioxidant enzyme activities of Baccaurea ramilfora seeds were studied in this paper. The initial water content(WC) of Bramilfora seeds was high 172 g H2O·g1DW, and germination was 8667%, respectively. When the seeds dehydrated to the same water content (0.90g H2O·g1DW), the germination of seeds increased with slwodehydrated method ( 9778%), while decreased with rapiddehydrated method ( 6444%). The germination of rapiddehydrated seeds with 076 g H2O·g1DW WC was 2167%, while that of slowdehydrated seeds with 068 g H2O·g1DW WC was 5556%. The Bramilfora seeds were recalcitrant seeds which showed higher tolerance to slow dehydration. Both of relative electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation increased following hedehydration, and the increase rate of slowdehydrated seeds were slower than rapiddehydrated seeds. Among these antioxidant enzymes, the activities of SOD, DHAR and APX were higher in rapiddehydrated seeds than slowdehydrated seeds, while CAT was lower, and GR was not found. These results indicated that CAT played more important role in desiccation tolerance of Bramilfora seeds than the other antioxidant enzymes.

Key words: Baccaurea ramilfora, Drying rate, Antioxidant enzyme, Lipid peroxidation, Desiccation sensitivity

中图分类号:

Q 945

路信1,2, 罗银玲1,3, 王一帆1, 兰芹英1. 不同脱水速率对木奶果种子脱水敏感性及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. Plant Diversity, 2010, 32(4): 361-366.

LU Xin-, LUO Yin-Ling-, WANG Yi-Fan-, LAN Qin-Ying. Effect of Different Drying Rates on the Desiccation Tolerance and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Baccaurea ramilfora (Euphorbiaceae) Seeds[J]. Plant Diversity, 2010, 32(4): 361-366.

参考文献

Aebi HE, 1983. Catalase \
[A\]. In: Bergmeyer HU ed. Methods of Enzymatic Analyses \
[M\]. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie, 273—286
Arrigoni O, De Gara L, Tommasi F et al, 1992. Changes in the ascorbate system during seed development of Viciafaba \
[J\]. Plant Physiology, 99: 235—238
Bilia DAC, MarcosFilho J, Novembre ADCL, 1999. Desiccation tolerance and seed storability of Inga uruguensis （Hook. Et. Arn. ） \
[J\]. Seed Science and Technology, 27: 77—89
Bradford MM, 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of proteindye binding \
[J\]. Analytical Biochemistry, 72: 248—254
Donahue JL, Okpodu MC, Cramer CL et al, 1997. Responses of antioxidants to tparaquat in pea leaves \
[J\]. Plant Physiology, 113: 249—257
FinchSavage WE, Blake PS, 1994. Indeterminate development in desiccationsensitive seeds of Quercus robur L. \
[J\]. Seed Science Research, 4: 127—133
Greggains V, FinchSavage WE, Atherton NM et al, 2001. Viability loss and free radical processes during desiccation of recalcitrant Avicennia marina seeds \
[J\]. Seed Science Research,11: 235—242
Halliwell B, Foyer CH, 1978. Properties and physiological function of a glutathione reductase purified from spinach leaves by affinity chmmatography \
[J\]. Planta, 139: 9—17
Hendry GAF, 1993. Oxygen, free radical processes and seed longevity \
[J\]. Seed Science Research, 3:141—153
Jiang M, Zhang J, 2001. Efect of ahseisic acid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings \
[J\]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 42: 1265—1273
Konstantinidou E, Takos I, Merou T, 2008. Desiccation and storage behavior of bay laurel （Laurus nobilis L.） seeds \
[J\]. European Journal of Forest Research, 127: 25—31
Knrzer OC, Dumer J, Boger P, 1996. Alterations in the antioxidative system of suspensioncultured soybean cells（Glycine max） induced by oxidative stress \
[J\]. Physiologia Plantarum, 97: 388—396
Luo YL（罗银玲）, Song SQ（宋松泉）, He HY（何惠英） et al, 2005. Changes in desiccation tolerance of maize embryos during it′s development \
[ J \] . Acta Botanica Yunnanica （云南植物研究）, 27: 301—309
Li YH（李永红）, Ma YM（马颖敏）, 2008. Effects of drying at different rates on desiccation sensitivity and membrane lipid peroxidation of Pachira macrocarpa seeds \
[J\]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops（热带作物学报）, 6: 738—743
Pammenter NW, Greggains V, Kioko JI et al, 1998. Efects of differential drying rates on viability retention of recalcitrant seeds of Ekebergha capensis \
[J\]. Seed Science Research, 8: 463—471
Pammenter NW, Berjak P, 1999. A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccationtolerance mechanisms \
[J\]. Seed Science Research, 9: 13—37
Pammenter NW, Berjak P, Waiters C, 2000. The Effects of Drying Rate on Recalcitrant Seeds: ‘Lethal Water Content’Causes of Damage, and Quantification of Recalcitrance \
[A\]. In: Black M, Bradford KJ, VzquezRamos J eds. Seed Biology: Advances and Applications \
[M\]. Oxon: CABI Pubshing, 215—221
Roach T, Ivanova M, Beckett PP et al, 2008. An oxidative burst of superoxide in embryonic axes of 19 recalcitrant sweet chestnut seeds as induced by excision and desiccation \
[J\]. Physiologia Plantarum, 133: 131—139
Roberts EH, 1973. Predicting the storage life of seeds \
[J\]. Seed Science and Tecnology, 1: 499—514
Shao YT（邵玉涛）, Yin SH （殷寿华）, Lan QY （兰芹英） et al, 2006. Developmental changes in relation to desiccation tolerance of Archontophoenix alexandrae（Palmae） seeds \
[J\]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica （云南植物研究）, 28: 515—522
Smith MT, Berjak P, 1995. Deterioarative Changes Associated with the Loss of Viability of Stored DesiccationTolerance and Desiccationsensitive Seeds \
[A\]. In: Kigel J, Galili G eds. Seed Development and Germination \
[M\]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 701—746
Song SQ, BeIjal P, Pammenter N et al, 2003. Seed recalcitrance: a currant assessment \
[J\]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 45 (6): 638—643
Waters C, Pammenter NW, Berjak P et al, 2001. Desiccation damage, accelerate ageing and respiration in desiccation tolerant and sensitive seeds \
[J\]. Seed Science Research, 11: 135—148
WesleySmith J, Pammenter NW, Berjak P et al, 2001. The efects of two drying rates on the desiccation tolerance of embryonic axes of recalcitrant jackfruit （Artocarpus heterophyllus Lamk.） seeds \
[J\]. Annals of Botany, 88: 653—664
Wu XJ（伍进贤）, Song SQ（宋松泉） Qian CM（钱春梅）et al, 2001. Effects of drying at different rates on desiccation sensitivity and membrane lipid peroxidation in Chinese wampee \
[ Clausena lansiumn （Lour.） Skeels\] axes \
[J\]. Acta Phytophysiogogica Sinica （植物生理学报）, 27: 407—412
Yan XF（闫兴富）, Du Q（杜茜）, Wang JL（王建礼）et al, 2009. Effects of dehydrating treatments on seeds germination of Ligustrum obtusifolium \
[J\]. Seed （种子）, 7: 93—96

[1]	李雄, 杨云强, 杨时海, 马岚, 孔祥翔, 胡向阳, 杨永平. 蛋白质水平解析高山嵩草对青藏高原昼夜环境的响应[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(2): 145-156.
[2]	杨艳1、2, 黎云祥1、2, 胥晓2、3. 珙桐种子休眠解除和萌发过程中主要抗氧化酶活性和代谢产物含量的变化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(06): 779-787.
[3]	薛鹏, 文彬. 脱水速率对非洲柚种子脱水耐性的影响[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(03): 293-300.
[4]	庄明浩1, 李迎春1, 李应1, 顾李俭2, 陈双林1. 毛竹对大气臭氧浓度倍增的生理响应[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(01): 69-75.
[5]	李忠光, 龚明􊳘. 抗氧化系统在热激诱导的玉米幼苗耐热性形成中的作用[J]. Plant Diversity, 2007, 29(02): 231-236.
[6]	王松华, 周正义, 何庆元, 王晓鹏, 宋李红, 陆晓明. 一氧化氮对小麦叶片镍毒害的缓解作用[J]. Plant Diversity, 2007, 29(01): 115-121.
[7]	邵玉涛; 殷寿华; 兰芹英; 张晓燕. 假槟榔种子脱水耐性的发育变化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2006, 28(05): 515-522.
[8]	罗银玲，宋松泉. 玉米胚发育过程中脱水耐性的变化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2005, 27(03): 301-309.
[9]	何惠英宋松泉. 滇南红厚壳种子的脱水敏感性及其影响萌发的因子[J]. Plant Diversity, 2003, 25(06): 1-3.
[10]	宋松泉龙春林殷寿华兰芹英. 种子的脱水行为及其分子机制[J]. Plant Diversity, 2003, 25(04): 1-3.

不同脱水速率对木奶果种子脱水敏感性及抗氧化酶活性的影响

Effect of Different Drying Rates on the Desiccation Tolerance and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Baccaurea ramilfora (Euphorbiaceae) Seeds

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价