四种番荔枝科植物花粉形态

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1143.2012.12044

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用扫描和透射电子显微镜，观察了番荔枝科（Annonaceae）4属4种植物的花粉形态与结构。刺果番荔枝（Annona muricata）和金钩花（Pseuduvaria trimera）为四合花粉，有四角形、偏菱形、T-型、十字形和四面体形。前者花粉表面具小穿孔，后者为皱波状纹饰。蕉木（Oncodostigma hainanense）和那大紫玉盘（Uvaria macclurei）为单花粉，前者表面为皱波状纹饰，后者为粗褶皱状纹饰。透射电子显微镜下，蕉木和那大紫玉盘覆盖层较厚、连续。蕉木覆盖下层较薄，偶尔可见颗粒状物质或不规则小柱，为过渡型覆盖下层；那大紫玉盘覆盖下层颗粒状。基层分为内外两层，外层较厚，平或呈波浪状，内层具有2~4片层结构。在不同属或同属不同种之间，花粉特征差异较大，多样性非常丰富。金钩花具有四合花粉、覆盖下层小柱状等进化特征，同时又具有花粉粒小、覆盖层无穿孔等较原始特征。

关键词: 番荔枝科, 花粉形态, 超微结构, 四合花粉, 单花粉

Abstract:

Pollen grains of four species representing four genera of Annonaceae were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The pollen grains are tetrads in Annona muricata and Pseuduvaria trimera under SEM. The type of tetrad is various, being tetragonal, rhomboidal, Tshaped, decussate and tetrahedral. The sculpture of pollen in A.muricata is psilate and foveolate, but rugulate in P.trimera. The pollen grains are monad in Oncodostigma hainanense and Uvaria macclurei. In the former species, the ornamentation is rugulate, and in the latter it is coarsely folded. Under TEM, the tectum is thick and continuous in O.hainanense and U.macclurei. The materials from infratectal layer are less accumulated. There is an intermediate infratectal layer in O.hainanense, for some irregular columellae and sparse granules are both observed, but there is a granular infratectal layer in U.macclurei. Basal layer consists of an outer layer and a foliated inner layer. The outer layer is thick, and flat or fluctuant. The inner layer is composed of two to four foliations. The morphological differences are great among different genera or different species in the same genus, indicating a high diversity of pollen morphology in Annonaceae. There are both primitive and derived characters in O.hainanense or P.trimera. Such as in P.trimera, small size pollen grain and imperforate tectum are primitive characters, but tetrad and columellar infratecal layer are derived.

Key words: Annonaceae, Pollen morphology, Ultrastructure, Tetrad, Monad

中图分类号:

Q 944

刘永, 徐凤霞. 四种番荔枝科植物花粉形态[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(5): 443-452.

LIU Yong, XU Feng-Xia. Pollen Morphology of Four Selected Species in the Annonaceae[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(5): 443-452.

参考文献

蒋英, 李秉滔, 1979. 番荔枝科［A］. 见: 中国植物志［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 30: 176—205
APGIII, 2009. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APGIII［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161 (2): 105—121
Chaowasku T, Mols J, van der Ham RWJM et al., 2008. Pollen morphology of Miliusa and relatives (Annonaceae) ［J］. Grana, 47 (3): 175—184
Chatrou LW, Rainer H, Maas JM, 2004. Annonaceae［A］. In: Smith N, Mori SA, Henderson A et al. (eds.), Flowering Plants of the Neotropics［M］. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 18—20
Couvreur TLP, Botermans M, van Heuven BJ et al., 2008. Pollen morphology within the Monodora clade, a diverse group of five African Annonaceae genera［J］. Grana, 47 (3): 185—210
Doyle JA,Le Thomas A,1994.Cladistic analysis and pollen evolution in Annonaceae［J］.Acta Botanica Gallica,141:149—170
Doyle JA, Le Thomas A, 1996. Phylogenetic analysis and character evolution in Annonaceae［J］. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Section B, Adansonia, 18: 279—334
Doyle JA, Le Thomas A, 1997. Significance of palynology for phylogeny of Annonaceae: experiments with removal of pollen characters［J］. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 206 (1-4): 133—159
Doyle JA, Bygrave P, Le Thomas A, 2000. Implications of molecular data for pollen evolution in Annonaceae［A］. In: Harley MM, Morton CM, Blackmore S (eds.), Pollen and Spores: Morphology and Biology［M］. UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 259—284
Gabarayeva NI, 1992. Sporoderm development in Asimina triloba (Annonaceae)［J］. Grana, 31 (3): 213—222
Gabarayeva NI, 1993. Sporoderm development in Asimina triloba (Annonaceae). II. The developmental events after callose dissolution［J］. Grana, 32 (4-5): 210—220
Hesse M, Waha M, 1984. Sporoderm characters of Tetrameranthus duckei (Annonaceae) and their systematic implications［J］. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 147 (3-4): 323—326
Hesse M, Morawetz W, Ehrendorfer F, 1985. Pollen ultrastructure and systematic affinities of Anaxagorea (Annonaceae) ［J］. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 148 (3-4): 253—285
Le Thomas A, 1980. Ultrastructural characters of the pollen grains of African Annonaceae and their significance for the phylogeny of primitive angiosperms (First part) ［J］. Pollen et Spores, 22 (3): 267—342
Le Thomas A, 1981. Ultrastructural characters of the pollen grains of African Annonaceae and their significance for the phylogeny of primitive angiosperms (Second part) ［J］. Pollen et Spores, 23 (4): 5—36
Le Thomas A, Morawetz W, Waha M, 1986. Pollen of palaeo and neotropical Annonaceae: definition of the aperture by morphological and functional characters［A］. In: Blackmore S, Ferguson IK (eds.), Pollen and Spores: Form and Function［M］. London: Academic Press. Linnean Society Symposium Series, 12: 375—388
Lora J, Testillano PS, Risueo MC et al., 2009. Pollen development in Annona cherimola Mill. (Annonaceae): Implications for the evolution of aggregated pollen［J］. BMC Plant Biology, 9 (1): 129—139
Morawetz W, Waha M, 1991. Development and function of pollen connecting threads in Porcelia (Annonaceae) ［J］. Beitraege zur Biologie der Pflanzen, 66 (1): 145—154
Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S et al., 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology［J］. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 143: 1—81
Richardson JE, Chatrou LW, Mols JB et al., 2004. Historical biogeography of two cosmopolitan families of flowering plants: Annonaceae and Rhamnaceae［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 359 (1450): 1494—1508
Sauquet H, Doyle JA, Scharaschkin T et al., 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets: implications for character evolution［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 142 (2): 125—186
Su YCF, Saunders RMK, 2003. Pollen structure, tetrad cohesion and pollen—connecting threads in Pseuduvaria (Annonaceae) ［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 143 (1): 69—78
Su YCF, Saunders RMK, 2009. Evolutionary divergence times in the Annonaceae: evidence of a late Miocene origin of Pseuduvaria in Sundaland with subsequent diversification in New Guinea［J］. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9: 153
Tsou CH, Fu YL, 2002. Tetrad pollen formation in Annona (Annonaceae): proexine formation and binding mechanism［J］. Ame
rican Journal of Botany, 89 (5): 734—747

[1]	郑鑫1, 闵运江1, 徐波2, 孙航3, 周忠泽1. 横断山区植物的花粉形态及生态意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(06): 657-682.
[2]	杨晨璇, 陈丽, 王娟, 杨宇明, 李璐. 中国特有属藤山柳属 (猕猴桃科) 的花粉形态及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(05): 569-577.
[3]	牟凤娟1、4, 李双智1, 徐琼华2, 马士祝3, 张奠湘4. 山小橘属 (芸香科) 花粉形态及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(2): 109-118.
[4]	谢艳萍1、2, 孙航1, 聂泽龙1. 横断山区高山豆属的花粉形态及凉山高山豆的分类学地位[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(4): 326-.
[5]	张明英1、2、3, 陆露1、2, 李德铢1、2, 王红1、2. 小檗科的花粉演化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(01): 1-12.
[6]	许腊1、2, 陆露1, 李德铢1, 王红1. 川续断目的花粉演化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(3): 249-259.
[7]	甘小洪1, 丁雨龙2. 毛竹茎秆纤维细胞发育过程中的细胞程序性死亡[J]. Plant Diversity, 2010, 32(4): 285-295.
[8]	曹建国, 代小菲, 王全喜. 傅氏凤尾蕨精子发生超微结构的研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2010, 32(4): 303-314.
[9]	曹建国, 杨耐英, 王全喜 . 水蕨卵膜的形成及其超微结构的观察[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(05): 543-548.
[10]	甘小洪1 , 丁雨龙2 . 一种特殊的长寿细胞: 毛竹茎秆纤维细胞[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(02): 151-158.
[11]	孙同兴1 , 吴鸿2 , 李秉滔2 . 番荔枝科植物叶的比较解剖学[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(01): 19-37.
[12]	刘广福1 , 2 , 王慷林1 , 杨宇明3 . 省藤族十六种植物的花粉形态[J]. Plant Diversity, 2007, 29(05): 513-520.
[13]	何涛1 , 吴学明2 , 张改娜1 , 王学仁1 , 贾敬芬1 . 不同海拔火绒草叶绿体超微结构的比较[J]. Plant Diversity, 2005, 27(06): 639-643.
[14]	陆露，王红，韦仲新. 山柳科和堇菜科八个种的花粉形态——兼谈第伦桃亚纲六个科及省沽油科的系统关系[J]. Plant Diversity, 2005, 27(03): 269-278.
[15]	陆露王红. 大风子科13个种的花粉形态[J]. Plant Diversity, 2004, 26(01): 1-3.