二型花柱植物滇丁香二态和单态种群间花部形态变异模式

doi:10.7677/ynzwyj201515011

Plant Diversity ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 513-521.DOI: 10.7677/ynzwyj201515011

二型花柱植物滇丁香二态和单态种群间花部形态变异模式

周伟1、2, 李德铢1、2, 王红1

1 中国科学院昆明植物研究所东亚植物多样性与生物地理学重点实验室，昆明650201；
2 中国科学院昆明植物研究所中国西南野生生物种质资源库，昆明650201

收稿日期:2015-01-22 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-03-25
基金资助:
The National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB954100), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academic of Sciences (KJZDEWL07), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200289, 31570384, 31320103919), and the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (2012FB182)

Patterns of Floral Variation between Dimorphic and Monomorphic Populations in Distylous Luculia pinceana (Rubiaceae)

ZHOU Wei-1、2, LI De-Zhu-1、2, WANG Hong-1

1 Key Laboratory for Plant Biodiversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; 2 Germplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China,
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China

Received:2015-01-22 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-03-25
Supported by:
The National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB954100), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academic of Sciences (KJZDEWL07), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200289, 31570384, 31320103919), and the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (2012FB182)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

花部形态特征在植物交配系统的演化与维持过程中起关键作用，交配方式的转变将可能伴随着相应花部形态的调整。为探寻交配系统与花形态变异之间的联系，本研究对二型花柱植物滇丁香（Luculia pinceana）的二态和单态种群的花部形态特征进行比较分析。结果表明花部形态在两种不同花型构造的种群间分化程度显著大于花型构造相同的种群间变异。相对于二态种群而言，长花柱的单态种群中雌雄异位距离缩小，且个体间雌雄生殖器官在空间上的非法重叠程度增高，花部形态的调整能够同时促进自交和同型异交。在异型花柱物种内，异交为主的二型花柱种群向单态种群转变过程中自交比率预期上升，本研究表明花部形态的变异模式与交配系统转变相一致。

关键词: 滇丁香, 花部形态变异, 二型花柱, 二态, 单态

Abstract:

Flower morphology plays an important role in the evolution and maintenance of plant mating systems, including disassortative mating of heterostylous species. The transition of mating patterns may be associated with the remodification of intraspecific flower morphology. To determine the functional relationship between floral variation and transition of mating patterns, we conducted a series of morphometric analyses in a distylous species Luculia pinceana, which possesses dimorphic and monomorphic populations. Our results indicate that floral variation was higher between different types of populations than between populations of the same type. Compared to dimorphic populations, some floral characters, reduced stigmaanther separation within flowers and increased overlap of stigmas and anthers (illegitimate spatial matching of sexual organs) among individuals in populations containing only the longstyled morph may have been modified to increase both selfing and intramorph crossing. The observed patterns of floral variation between dimorphic and monomorphic populations coincide with the transition of mating patterns from disassortative mating to selfing and/or intramorph crossing.

Key words: Luculia pinceana, Distyly, Floral morphological variation, Dimorphic, Monomorphic

中图分类号:

Q 944

周伟1、2, 李德铢1、2, 王红1. 二型花柱植物滇丁香二态和单态种群间花部形态变异模式[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(05): 513-521.

ZHOU Wei-, LI De-Zhu-, WANG Hong. Patterns of Floral Variation between Dimorphic and Monomorphic Populations in Distylous Luculia pinceana (Rubiaceae)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(05): 513-521.

参考文献

Barrett SCH, 2003. Mating strategies in plants: the outcrossingselfing paradigm and beyond［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 358: 991—1004
Barrett SCH, Hodgins KA, 2006. Floral design and the evolution of asymmetrical mating systems［A］// Harder LD, Barrett SCH eds., Ecology and Evolution of Flowers［M］. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239—254
Barrett SCH, Shore JS, 1987. Variation and evolution of breeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae) ［J］. Evolution, 41: 340—354
Brys R, Jacquemyn H, Hermy M, 2007. Impact of mate availability, population size, and spatial aggregation of morphs on sexual reproduction in a distylous, aquatic plant［J］. American Journal of Botany, 94: 119—127
Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, 1979. A model for the evolution of distyly［J］. The American Naturalist, 114: 467—498
Cresswell JE, 1998. Stabilizing selection and the structural variability of flowers within species［J］. Annals of Botany, 81: 463—473
Cresswell JE, 2000. Manipulation of female architecture in flowers reveals a narrow optimum for pollen deposition［J］. Ecology, 81: 3244—3249
Feinsinger P, 1983. Coevolution and pollination［A］// Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M eds., Coevolution［M］. Sunderland: Sinauer, 282—310
Galen C, 1999. Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations［J］. Bioscience, 49: 631—640
Gong YB, Huang SQ, 2009. Floral symmetry: pollinatormediated stabilizing selection on flower size in bilateral species［J］. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276: 4013—4020
Herrera J, 2001. The variability of organs differentially involved in pollination, and correlations of traits in Genisteae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) ［J］. Annals of Botany, 88: 1027—1037
Herrera J, 2005. Flower size variation in Rosmarinus officinalis: individuals, populations and habitats［J］. Annals of Botany, 95: 431—437
Hodgins KA, Barrett SCH, 2006. Mating patterns and demography in the tristylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus［J］. Heredity, 96: 262—270
Hodgins KA, Barrett SCH, 2008. Asymmetrical mating patterns and the evolution of biased stylemorph ratios in a tristylous daffodil［J］. Genetics Research, 90: 3—15
Kalman K, Medvegy A, Penzes Z et al., 2007. Morphspecific variation of floral traits associated with reciprocal herkogamy in natural populations of Primula vulgaris and Primula veris［J］. Plant Systematics and Evolotion, 268: 15—27
Lau P, Bosque C, 2003. Pollen flow in the distylous Palicourea fendleri (Rubiaceae): an experimental test of the disassortative pollen flow hypothesis［J］. Oecologia, 135: 593—600
Lloyd DG, Webb CJ, 1992. The selection of heterostyly［A］// Barrett SCH ed., Evolution and Function of Heterostyly［M］. Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 179—207
Luo XR, Gao WZ, Chen WQ et al., 1999. Rubiaceae［A］// Wu ZY ed., Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae［M］. Beijing: Science Press
Ma H, Wang Y, Li ZH et al., 2009. A study on the breeding system of Luculia pinceana［J］. Forest Research, 22: 373—378
Mal TK, LovettDoust J, 2005. Phenotypic plasticity in vegetative and reproductive traits in an invasive weed, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae), in response to soil moisture［J］. American Journal of Botany, 92: 819—825
Motten AF, Stone JL, 2000. Heritability of stigma position and the effect of stigmaanther separation on outcrossing in a predominantly selffertilizing weed,Datura stramonium(Solanaceae) ［J］. American Journal of Botany, 87: 339—347
Naiki A, Nagamasu H, 2004. Correlation between distyly and ploidy level in Damnacanthus (Rubiaceae) ［J］. American Journal of Botany, 91: 664—671
R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing［OL］. Available from: http://www.rproject.org.
Sakai S, Wright SJ, 2008. Reproductive ecology of 21 coexisting Psychotria species (Rubiaceae): when is heterostyly lost［J］. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93: 125—134
Sanchez JM, Ferrero V, Navarro L, 2008. A new approach to the quantification of degree of reciprocity in distylous (sensu lato) plant populations［J］. Annals of Botany, 102: 463—472
Stebbins GL, 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms［J］. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1: 307—326
VallejoMarin M, Barrett SCH, 2009. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of selffertilization［J］. Annals of Botany, 103: 951—962
Williams JL, Conner JK, 2001. Sources of phenotypic variation in floral traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae) ［J］. American Journal of Botany, 88: 1577—1581
Zhou W, Barrett SCH, Wang H et al., 2012. Loss of floral polymorphism in heterostylous species Luculia pinceana (Rubiaceae): a molecular phylogeographic perspective［J］. Molecular Ecology, 21: 4631—4645
Zhou W, Barrett SCH, Wang H et al., 2015. Reciprocal herkogamy promotes disassortative mating in a distylous species with intramorph compatibility［J］. New Phytologist, 206: 1503—1512

[1]	郑鑫1, 闵运江1, 徐波2, 孙航3, 周忠泽1. 横断山区植物的花粉形态及生态意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(06): 657-682.
[2]	辛桂亮, 郑俊鸣, 叶志勇, 张万超, 邓传远. 白骨壤次生木质部生态解剖学研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(05): 522-530.
[3]	姜紫薇, 刘保东, 成晓, 李晓东. 濒危孑遗蕨类植物云贵水韭的胚胎发育[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(05): 531-536.
[4]	周喜乐, 严岳鸿. 两种蕨类植物孢子囊柄的结构观察[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(03): 271-274.
[5]	龚强帮, 李志敏, 彭德力, 牛洋, 孙航, 张志强. 利用腊叶标本初探豹子花属植物的性表达及其与个体大小的关系[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(01): 11-20.
[6]	杨晨璇, 陈丽, 王娟, 杨宇明, 李璐. 中国特有属藤山柳属 (猕猴桃科) 的花粉形态及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(05): 569-577.
[7]	朱俊义, 张力凡, 沈鹏, 任保青, 梁宇, 陈之端 . 榛属 (桦木科) 花序及花的形态发生[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(04): 433-442.
[8]	黄秀, 田代科, 张微微, 曾宋君, 莫海波. 荷花“重瓣化”的花器官形态发育比较观察[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(03): 303-309.
[9]	李霞, 郭振华. 麻竹节间伸长过程的初步研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(01): 22-28.
[10]	杨耀文1、2、3, 钱子刚3, 李爱荣1, 普春霞1、2、3, 刘小莉3, 管开云1. 温度和湿度对草果花柱卷曲的影响[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(5): 613-620.
[11]	邵文1、2, 陆树刚2. 假瘤蕨属植物配子体与幼孢子体发育的比较形态学研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(4): 522-528.
[12]	孔航辉1, 高乞2, 罗艳3, 杨亲二1. 国产乌头属（毛茛科）的种子形态及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 241-252.
[13]	张大才, 李双智, 候雄辉, 张明启. 川西高原12种风毛菊属植物瘦果形态和发芽特征[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 273-279.
[14]	张发起1, 付鹏程1、2, 高庆波1, 李印虎1、2, Gulzar Khan1、2, 陈世龙1. 蒺藜科及由其分出的两新科四种植物种子形态特征比较研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 280-284.
[15]	高庆波1、2, 张发起1、2, 付鹏程1、3, 刑睿1、3, 李印虎1、3. 青海省五种葱属植物的种皮微形态[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 285-289.

二型花柱植物滇丁香二态和单态种群间花部形态变异模式

Patterns of Floral Variation between Dimorphic and Monomorphic Populations in Distylous Luculia pinceana (Rubiaceae)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价