中国唇形科草糙苏属分类学研究杂记

doi:10.7677/ynzwyj201413228

Plant Diversity ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 551-560.DOI: 10.7677/ynzwyj201413228

• 研究论文 • 下一篇

中国唇形科草糙苏属分类学研究杂记

向春雷1, 董洪进1, 胡国雄1、2, 周静3, 彭华1

1 中国科学院昆明植物研究所东亚植物多样性与生物地理学重点实验室，云南昆明650201; 2 中国科学院大学，北京100049; 3 昆明医科大学药学院暨云南省天然药物药理重点实验室，云南昆明650500

收稿日期:2013-11-25 出版日期:2014-09-25 发布日期:2014-07-14
基金资助:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (31110103911, 31100164)；Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2EWZ1)；the Ministry of Science and Technology China, Basic Research Project (2013FY112100)

Taxonomic Notes on the Genus Phlomoides (Lamiaceae: Lamioideae) from China

XIANG Chun-Lei1, DONG Hong-Jin1, HU Guo-Xiong1、2, ZHOU Jing3, PENG Hua1

1 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 School of Pharmaceutical Science & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Nature Products, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China

Received:2013-11-25 Online:2014-09-25 Published:2014-07-14
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (31110103911, 31100164)；Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2EWZ1)；the Ministry of Science and Technology China, Basic Research Project (2013FY112100)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

最近的研究结果表明，国产糙苏属（Phlomis）的所有种类（除了栽培种橙花糙苏Pfruticosa以外）以及沙穗属（Eremostachys）、独一味属（Lamiphlomis）、钩萼草属（Notochaete）均应并入草糙苏属（Phlomoides）。新界定的草糙苏属因其草本习性等特征而与糙苏属易于区别。尽管已有不同作者对国产草糙苏属大部分物种名称进行了新组合，但仍遗漏了11个物种名称。为方便使用，本文对这11个名称进行了新组合，同时提供了新界定的草糙苏属国产物种名录及检索表，共50种9变种。

关键词: 糙苏属, 糙苏族, 草糙苏属, 唇形科, 新组合

Abstract:

Recent phylogenetic studies have investigated the tribe Phlomideae and, in particular, the degree of “inclusiveness” of the genus Phlomoides. As a result, Eremostachys, Lamiophlomis, Notochaete and all Chinese Phlomis, excepted for cultivated Pfruticosa, were transferred to the latest redefined Phlomoides. The newly circumscribed Phlomoides is easily distinguished from Phlomis by its herbaceous habit and several other traits. Although the necessary new combinations for the Chinese species have been made elsewhere, unfortunately, eleven names were omitted by previous researchers. Therefore, this paper proposes 11 new nomenclatural combinations in Phlomoides, and provides a checklist and a key to all Chinese Phlomoides.

Key words: Phlomis, Tribe Phlomideae, Phlomoides, Lamiaceae, New combinations

中图分类号:

Q 949

向春雷, 董洪进, 胡国雄, 周静, 彭华. 中国唇形科草糙苏属分类学研究杂记[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(05): 551-560.

XIANG Chun-Lei, DONG Hong-Jin, HU Guo-Xiong, ZHOU Jing, PENG Hua. Taxonomic Notes on the Genus Phlomoides (Lamiaceae: Lamioideae) from China[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(05): 551-560.

参考文献

Adylov TA, Kamelin RV, Makhmedov AM, 1986. Zametkio semeistve Lamiaceae 1 (Notes on Lamiaceae 1) ［J］. Novosti Sistematiki Vysshikh Rastenii, 23: 110—114
Adylov TA, Makhmedov AM, 1987. Phlomoides Moench［A］. In: Adylov TA (ed.), Conspectus florae Asiae Mediae［M］. Tashkent: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 9: 82—107
Astanova SB, 1984. Chromosome numbers in the species of the families Alliaceae, Asteraceae, Caryophyllaceae, Ebenaceae, Linaceae, Oleaceae, Lamiaceae from Tadjikistan［J］. Botanicˇhnyi urnal (Moscow & Leningrad), 69: 1563—1564
Azizian D, Cutler DF, 1982. Anatomical, cytological and phytochemical studies on Phlomis L. and Eremostachys Bunge (Labiatae) ［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 85: 249—281
Bentham G, 1829. Notochaete［J］. Edwards’s Botanical Register, 15: pl. 1289
Bentham G, 1832-1836. Labiatarum Genera et Species ［M］. London: James Ridgway & Sons
Boissier E, 1879. Flora orientalis, Vol4, pt1 ［M］. Geneva, Basel, Leiden: H. Georg
Briquet J, 1895-1897. Labiatae. Eremostachys Bunge, Phlomis L［A］. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilein［M］. Leipzig: Engelmann, 4 (3a, 134): 246—249
Brullo S, Guglielmo A, Pavone P et al., 1990. Chromosome counts of flowering plants from N. Cyrenaica［J］. Candollea, 45: 65—74
Bunge A, 1830. Eremostachys Bunge ［A］. In: Ledebour CF, Meyer CA, Bunge A (eds.), Flora Altaica［M］. Berlin: G. Reimer, 2: 414—416
Fang LQ (房丽琴), Pang YZ (潘跃芝), Gong X (龚洵), 2007. A karyomorphological study in the monotypic genus Lamiophlomis and five species in Phlomis (Lamiaceae) ［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 45: 627—632
Ghaffari SM, 2006. New or rare chromosome counts of some angiosperm species from Iran［J］. Iranian Journal of Botany, 11: 185—192
Kamelin RV, Makhmedov AM, 1990a. The system of the genus Phlomoides (Lamiaceae) ［J］. Botanicˇhnyi urnal (Moscow & Leningrad), 75: 241—250
Kamelin RV, Makhmedov AM, 1990b. A new system of the genus Phlomis (Lamiaceae) ［J］. Botanicˇhnyi urnal (Moscow & Leningrad), 75: 1163—1167Kud Y, 1929. Labiatarum SinoJaponicarum prodormus ［A］. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science and Agriculture, Taihoku Imperial University, 2: 1—332Mathiesen C, Scheen AC, Lindqvist C, 2011. Phylogeny and biogeography of the lamioid genus Phlomis (Lamiaceae) ［J］. Kew Bulletin, 66: 83—99Moench C, 1794. Methodus Plantas Horti Botanici et Argi Marburgensis, A Staminum Situ Describendi ［M］. Marburg: Officina Nova Libraria AcademiaePan YZ, Fang LQ, Hao G et al., 2009. Systematic positions of Lamiophlomis and Paraphlomis (Lamiaceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequences［J］. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 47: 535—542Ryding O, 2008. Pericarp structure and phylogeny of the Phlomis group (Lamiaceae subfam. Lamioideae) ［J］. Botanische Jahrbü
cher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, 127: 299—316Salmaki Y, Zarres S, Heubl G, 2012a. The genus Phlomoides Moench (Lamiaceae; Lamioideae; Phlomideae) in Iran: an updated synopsis［J］. Iranian Journal of Botany, 18: 207—219Salmaki Y, Zarre S, Ryding O et al., 2012b. Phylogeny of the tribe Phlomideae (Lamioideae: Lamiaceae) with special focus on Eremostachys and Phlomoides: new insights from nuclear and chloroplast sequences ［J］. Taxon, 61 (1): 161—179Wu CY (吴征镒), Li HW (李锡文), 1977. Phlomis L. ［A］. In: Wu CY (吴征镒) (ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinica［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 65 (2): 428—478

[1]	洪德元. Codonopsis draco Ramp. (桔梗科) 的身份鉴定，特别提及它的濒危状态[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(03): 301-302.
[2]	向春雷1, 陈丽1, 陈亚萍1、2, 胡国雄1、2, 彭华1. 铃子香属的叶表皮微形态特征及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(1): 1-10.
[3]	朱锋1 , 2 , 刘玲丽1 , 邸迎彤1 , 郝小江1 , 何红平1 . 半枝莲的一个新的克罗烷二萜[J]. Plant Diversity, 2009, 31(05): 474-476.
[4]	袁琼 . 国产菊科植物两个新组合[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(04): 439-440.
[5]	赵勇1 , 2 , 3 , 黄胜雄1 , 杨黎彬1 , 3 , 李丽梅1 , 肖伟烈1 , 普建新1 , 孙汉董1 . 鄂西香茶菜中一个新的苯取代二酮[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(02): 243-245.
[6]	向春雷1 , 2 , 彭华1 . 白花铃子香的模式指定[J]. Plant Diversity, 2008, 30(01): 15-16.
[7]	文军; 陈之端. 中国葡萄科一新组合———狭叶乌蔹莓[J]. Plant Diversity, 2006, 28(05): 471-472.
[8]	陆树刚，李春香. 中国黑桫椤属植物(桫椤科)一新组合种[J]. Plant Diversity, 2005, 27(01): 39-41.
[9]	赵爱华，赵勤实，李蓉涛，孙汉董. 肾茶的化学成分[J]. Plant Diversity, 2004, 26(05): 1-3.
[10]	赵爱华彭丽艳王宗玉孙汉董. 白叶香茶菜中的紫罗兰酮衍生物[J]. Plant Diversity, 2003, 25(04): 1-3.
[11]	文军　LEE Chung-Hee　邓云飞. 湖南参属的归并及亚洲木属(五加科)的一个新种和一些名称的变更[J]. Plant Diversity, 2002, 24(05): 1-3.
[12]	姜北　韩全斌　项伟林中文孙汉董　　　. 腺花香茶菜中的三萜化合物[J]. Plant Diversity, 2002, 24(05): 1-3.
[13]	邓云飞　　　　　　　　　　. 中国五加科植物资料[J]. Plant Diversity, 2002, 24(05): 1-3.
[14]	纳智　项伟　赵勤实　梅双喜　李朝明　林中文　孙汉董　 . 牛尾草中一新的对映-贝壳杉烷型二萜[J]. Plant Diversity, 2002, 24(02): 1-3.
[15]	纳智　项伟　李朝明　林中文　孙汉董　 . 紫毛香茶菜中的黄酮类化合物[J]. Plant Diversity, 2002, 24(01): 1-3.

中国唇形科草糙苏属分类学研究杂记

Taxonomic Notes on the Genus Phlomoides (Lamiaceae: Lamioideae) from China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价