Canopy structural heterogeneity drives α and β species-genetic diversity correlations in a Chinese subtropical forest

doi:10.1016/j.pld.2024.08.003

Abstract

Abstract: Patterns and drivers of species-genetic diversity correlations (SGDCs) have been broadly examined across taxa and ecosystems and greatly deepen our understanding of how biodiversity is maintained. However, few studies have examined the role of canopy structural heterogeneity, which is a defining feature of forests, in shaping SGDCs. Here, we determine what factors contribute to α- and β-species-genetic diversity correlations (i.e., α- and β-SGDCs) in a Chinese subtropical forest. For this purpose, we used neutral molecular markers to assess genetic variation in almost all adult individuals of the dominant tree species, Lithocarpus xylocarpus, across plots in the Ailaoshan National Natural Reserve. We also quantified microhabitat variation by quantifying canopy structure heterogeneity with airborne laser scanning on 20 1-ha subtropical forest plots. We found that species α-diversity was negatively correlated with genetic α-diversity. Canopy structural heterogeneity was positively correlated with species α-diversity but negatively correlated with genetic α-diversity. These contrasting effects contributed to the formation of a negative α-SGDC. Further, we found that canopy structural heterogeneity increases species α-diversity and decreases genetic α-diversity by reducing the population size of target species. Species β-diversity, in contrast, was positively correlated with genetic β-diversity. Differences in canopy structural heterogeneity between plots had non-linear parallel effects on the two levels of β-diversity, while geographic distance had a relatively weak effect on β-SGDC. Our study indicates that canopy structural heterogeneity simultaneously affects plot-level community species diversity and population genetic diversity, and species and genetic turnover across plots, thus driving α- and β-SGDCs.

Key words: Dominant species, Forest structure, LiDAR, Lithocarpus xylocarpus, Species-genetic diversity correlation, Subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest

Zhiliang Yao, Xia Pan, Xin Yang, Xiaona Shao, Bin Wang, Yun Deng, Zhiming Zhang, Qiaoming Li, Luxiang Lin. Canopy structural heterogeneity drives α and β species-genetic diversity correlations in a Chinese subtropical forest[J]. Plant Diversity, 2025, 47(01): 106-114.

References

Adamack, A.T., Gruber, B., 2014. PopGenReport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 384-387.
Allouche, O., Kalyuzhny, M., Moreno-Rueda, G., et al., 2012. Area-heterogeneity tradeoff and the diversity of ecological communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17495-17500.
Antonovics, J. 2003. Toward community genomics? Ecology 84, 598-601.
Avolio, M.L., Smith, M.D., 2013. Correlations between genetic and species diversity: effects of resource quantity and heterogeneity. J. Veg. Sci. 24, 1185-1194.
Chao, A., Colwell, R.K., 2022. Biodiversity: concepts, dimensions, and measures. In: Loreau, M., Hector, A., Isbell, F. (Eds.), The Ecological and Societal Consequences of Biodiversity Loss. John Wiley, pp. 25-46.
Coverdale, T.C., Davies, A.B., 2023. Unravelling the relationship between plant diversity and vegetation structural complexity: a review and theoretical framework. J. Ecol. 111, 1378-1395.
Cushman, K.C., Detto, M., Garcia, M., et al., 2022. Soils and topography control natural disturbance rates and thereby forest structure in a lowland tropical landscape. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1126-1138.
Derry, A.M., Arnott, S.E., Shead, J.A., et al., 2009. Ecological linkages between community and genetic diversity in zooplankton among boreal shield lakes. Ecology 90, 2275-2286.
Doyle, J., 1991. DNA protocols for plants. In: Hewitt, G. M., Johnston, A.W.B., Young, J.P.W. (Eds.), Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy, Springer-Verlag, pp. 283-293.
Dyer, R.J., Nason, J.D., 2004. Population graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Mol. Ecol. 13, 1713-1727.
Dyer, R.J., 2015. Population graphs and landscape genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 327-342.
Ediriweera, S., Danaher, T., Pathirana, S., 2016. The influence of topographic variation on forest structure in two woody plant communities: a remote sensing approach. For. Syst. 25, e049.
Ehbrecht, M., Schall, P., Ammer, C., et al., 2017. Quantifying stand structural complexity and its relationship with forest management, tree species diversity and microclimate. Agric. For. Meteorol. 242, 1-9.
Ehlers, B.K., Damgaard, C.F., Laroche, F., 2016. Intraspecific genetic variation and species coexistence in plant communities. Biol. Lett. 12, 20150853.
Ellison, A.M., 2019. Foundation species, non-trophic interactions, and the value of being common. iScience 13, 254-268.
Ferrier, S., Manion, G., Elith, J., et al., 2007. Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Divers. Distrib. 13, 252-264.
Fitzpatrick, M.C., Keller, S.R., 2015. Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1-16.
Fotis, A.T., Morin, T.H., Fahey, R.T., et al., 2018. Forest structure in space and time: biotic and abiotic determinants of canopy complexity and their effects on net primary productivity. Agric. For. Meteorol. 250-251, 181-191.
Fourtune, L., Paz-Vinas, I., Loot, G., et al., 2016. Lessons from the fish: a multi-species analysis reveals common processes underlying similar species-genetic diversity correlations. Freshwater Biol. 61, 1830-1845.
Goslee, S. C., Urban, D. L., 2007. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J. Stat. Software 22, 1-19.
Gough, C.M., Atkins, J.W., Fahey, R.T., et al., 2020. Community and structural constraints on the complexity of eastern North American forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 2107-2118.
Gough, C.M., Atkins, J.W., Fahey, R.T., et al., 2022. Disturbance has variable effects on the structural complexity of a temperate forest landscape. Ecol. Indicat. 140, 109004.
Hahn, C.Z., Michalski, S.G., Fischer, M., et al., 2017. Genetic diversity and differentiation follow secondary succession in a multi-species study on woody plants from subtropical China. J. Plant Ecol. 10, 213-221.
Hardiman, B., Bohrer, G., Gough, C., et al., 2013. Canopy structural changes following widespread mortality of canopy dominant trees. Forests 4, 537-552.
He, T., Lamont, B.B., Krauss, S.L., et al., 2008. Covariation between intraspecific genetic diversity and species diversity within a plant functional group. J. Ecol. 96, 956-961.
Hill, M.O., 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427-432.
Hughes, A.R., Inouye, B.D., Johnson, M.T.J., et al., 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11, 609-623.
Ishii, N.I., Hirota, S.K., Matsuo, A., et al., 2022. Species-genetic diversity correlations depend on ecological similarity between multiple moorland plant species. Oikos e09023.
Johnson, M.T.J., Stinchcombe, J.R., 2007. An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 250-257.
Jombart, T., 2008. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403-1405.
Jucker, T., Hardwick, S.R., Both, S., et al., 2018. Canopy structure and topography jointly constrain the microclimate of human-modified tropical landscapes. Global Change Biol. 24, 5243-5258.
Kahilainen, A., Puurtinen, M., Kotiaho, J.S., 2014. Conservation implications of species-genetic diversity correlations. Global Ecol. Conserv. 2, 315-323.
Kane, V.R., McGaughey, R.J., Bakker, J.D., et al., 2010. Comparisons between field- and LiDAR-based measures of stand structural complexity. Can. J. For. Res. 40, 761-773.
Lamy, T., Laroche, F., David, P., et al., 2017. The contribution of species-genetic diversity correlations to the understanding of community assembly rules. Oikos 126, 759-771.
LaRue, E.A., Wagner, F.W., Fei, S., et al., 2020. Compatibility of aerial and terrestrial LiDAR for quantifying forest structural diversity. Rem. Sens. 12, 1407.
Marchesini, A., Vernesi, C., Battisti, A., et al., 2018. Deciphering the drivers of negative species-genetic diversity correlation in Alpine amphibians. Mol. Ecol. 27, 4916-4930.
Marquardt, P.E., Echt, C.S., Epperson, B.K., 2007. Genetic structure, diversity, and inbreeding of eastern white pine under different management conditions. Can. J. For. Res. 37, 2652-2662.
Matsuo, T., Hiura, T., Onoda, Y., 2022. Vertical and horizontal light heterogeneity along gradients of secondary succession in cool- and warm-temperate forests. J. Veg. Sci. 33, e13135.
Mokany, K., Ware, C., Woolley, S., et al., 2022. A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 802-821.
Moudry, V., Cord, A.F., Gabor, L., et al., 2023. Vegetation structure derived from airborne laser scanning to assess species distribution and habitat suitability: the way forward. Divers. Distrib. 29, 39-50.
Muscarella, R., Kolyaie, S., Morton, D.C., et al., 2020. Effects of topography on tropical forest structure depend on climate context. J. Ecol. 108, 145-159.
Noutsos, C., Borevitz, J.O., Hodges, S.A., 2014. Gene flow between nascent species: genotypic and phenotypic differentiation within and between Aquilegia formosa and A. pubescens. Mol. Ecol. 23, 5589-5598.
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G., Blanchet, F., et al., 2022. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.6-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Papadopoulou, A., Anastasiou, I., Spagopoulou, F., et al., 2011. Testing the species-genetic diversity correlation in the Aegean archipelago: toward a haplotype-based macroecology? Am. Nat. 178, 241-255.
Peck, J.E., Zenner, E.K., Brang, P., et al., 2014. Tree size distribution and abundance explain structural complexity differentially within stands of even-aged and uneven-aged structure types. Eur. J. For. Res. 133, 335-346.
Pușcaș, M., Taberlet, P., Choler, P., 2008. No positive correlation between species and genetic diversity in European alpine grasslands dominated by Carex curvula. Divers. Distrib. 14, 852-861.
Qiao, X., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., et al., 2021. Foundation species across a latitudinal gradient in China. Ecology 102, e03234.
Quintela, M., Johansson, M.P., Kristjansson, B.K., et al., 2014. AFLPs and mitochondrial haplotypes reveal local adaptation to extreme thermal environments in a freshwater gastropod. PLoS One 9, e101821.
R Core Team, 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
Robuchon, M., Leroy, B., Jezequel, C., et al., 2019. Correlations between broad-scale taxonomic and genetic differentiations suggest a dominant imprint of historical processes on beta diversities. J. Biogeogr. 46, 1083-1095.
Rosseel, Y., 2012. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Software 48, 1-36.
Roussel, J.R., Auty, D., Coops, N.C., et al., 2020. LidR: an R package for analysis of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. Remote Sens. Environ. 251, 112061.
Savary, P., Foltete, J-C., Moal, H., et al., 2021. Graph4lg: a package for constructing and analysing graphs for landscape genetics in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 539-547.
Sexton, J.P., Hangartner, S.B., Hoffmann, A.A., 2014. Genetic isolation by environment or distance: which pattern of gene flow is most common? Evolution 68, 1-15.
Sherwin, W.B., Chao, A., Jost, L., et al., 2017. Information theory broadens the spectrum of molecular ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 948-963.
Silvertown, J., Biss, P.M., Freeland, J., 2009. Community genetics: resource addition has opposing effects on genetic and species diversity in a 150-year experiment. Ecol. Lett. 12, 165-170.
Stein, A., Gerstner, K., Kreft, H., 2014. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 17, 866-880.
Struebig, M.J., Kingston, T., Petit, E.J., et al., 2011. Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments: parallel diversity declines in forest fragments. Ecol. Lett. 14, 582-590.
Taberlet, P., Zimmermann, N.E., Englisch, T., et al., 2012. Genetic diversity in widespread species is not congruent with species richness in alpine plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1439-1448.
Vellend, M., 2003. Island biogeography of genes and species. Am. Nat. 162, 358-365.
Vellend, M., 2005. Species diversity and genetic diversity: parallel processes and correlated patterns. Am. Nat. 166, 199-215.
Vellend, M., Geber, M.A., 2005. Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 8, 767-781.
Wehenkel, C., Bergmann, F., Gregorius, H.-R., 2006. Is there a trade-off between species diversity and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? Plant Ecol. 185, 151-161.
Whitlock, R., 2014. Relationships between adaptive and neutral genetic diversity and ecological structure and functioning: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 102, 857-872.
Xie, L., Feng, Y., Zhao, R., et al., 2023. Positive relationships between species diversity and genetic diversity on a local scale at Mt. Wu Yi, China. Biodivers. Conserv. 32, 4295-4311.
Xu, W., Liu, L., He, T., et al., 2016. Soil properties drive a negative correlation between species diversity and genetic diversity in a tropical seasonal rainforest. Sci. Rep. 6, 20652.
Yao, Z., Yang, X., Wang, B., et al., 2023. Multidimensional beta-diversity across local and regional scales in a Chinese subtropical forest: the role of forest structure. Ecol. Evol. 13, e10607.
You, C., 1983. Classification of vegetation in xujiaba region in Ailao Mts. In: Wu, Z.Y., Qu, Z.X., Jiang, H.Q. (Eds.), Research of Forest Ecosystem on Ailao Mountains, Yunnan. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, pp. 74-117. (In Chinese with English abstract).
Yu, F.H., Krusi, B.O., Schneller, J.J., et al., 2009. Positive correlation between vegetation dissimilarity and genetic differentiation of Carex sempervirens. Flora 204, 651-657.
Zellweger, F., Roth, T., Bugmann, H., et al., 2017. Beta diversity of plants, birds and butterflies is closely associated with climate and habitat structure. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 898-906.
Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Lutz, J. A., et al., 2022. Drone-acquired data reveal the importance of forest canopy structure in predicting tree diversity. For. Ecol. Manage. 505, 119945.

[1]	Qiao-Ming Li, Chao-Nan Cai, Wu-Mei Xu, Min Cao, Li-Qing Sha, Lu-Xiang Lin, Tian-Hua He. Adaptive genetic diversity of dominant species contributes to species co-existence and community assembly [J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(03): 271-278.
[2]	Uma Shankar, Amit Kumar Tripathi. Rainforests north of the Tropic of Cancer: Physiognomy, floristics and diversity in ‘lowland rainforests’ of Meghalaya, India [J]. Plant Diversity, 2017, 39(01): 20-36.
[3]	SHI Gang-Rong; LIU Lei. Secondary Xylem Anatomic Characteristics of Dominant Plant Species in Three Communities in Xiangshan Mountain, Huaibei , China [J]. Plant Diversity, 2006, 28(04): 363-370.
[4]	BAO Wei-Kai, LIU Zhao - Guang, LIU Chao-Lu, YUAN Ya-Fu. WANG Ze-Wei. Comparison to Floristic Diversity of the Primary and Secondary Humid Evergreen Broad - Leaved Forest in Wawushan National Forest Park of the Southwestern China [J]. Plant Diversity, 2000, 22(04): 1-3.