中国特有蕨属扇蕨属(水龙骨科)的系统学研究

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1143.2011.10188

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

扇蕨属(Neocheiropteris)为中国蕨类植物4个特有属之一。自Christ建属以来，不同的分类学者对本属的范畴以及系统位置一直存有争议。本研究对扇蕨属和盾蕨属进行了形态解剖观察，并对扇蕨属及其近缘类群共14个种的4个叶绿体DNA片段：rbcL、rpS4 & rpS4-trnS IGS、trnL intron & trnL-trnF IGS以及atpB & atpB-rbcL IGS进行测序，应用最大简约法（Maximum-parsimony）、最大似然法（Maximum-likelihood）和贝叶斯推断（Bayesian inference）对序列进行联合矩阵分析，并构建系统树。该研究从形态学和分子系统学方面都提出了支持扇蕨属和盾蕨属分立的证据。形态学研究显示扇蕨属和盾蕨属叶片分裂方式、叶被和侧脉特征迥异，支持扇蕨属和盾蕨属的分立；但两属根状茎鳞片的共同特征则反映了两属间的紧密联系。分子系统学研究表明扇蕨属与毛鳞蕨属和鳞果星蕨属构成姐妹群，其集合与盾蕨属构成姐妹群。综合形态学和分子系统学的证据，对扇蕨属的系统位置以及范畴进行了深入探讨，扇蕨属包括扇蕨和三出扇蕨，结合形态学和分子系统学证据对三出扇蕨的系统位置进行了初步探讨。

关键词: 扇蕨属, 系统学, 形态解剖, 叶绿体DNA序列

Abstract:

Neocheiropteris is one of the four Chinese endemic fern genera. The taxonomic circumscription and systematic position of Neocheiropteris have always been argued among taxonomists since its establishment by Christ in 1905. The anatomical examination of Neocheiropteris and Neolepisorus is performed, and four chloroplast DNA markers: rbcL, rpS4 & rpS4-trnS IGS, trnL intron & trnL-trnF IGS and atpB & atpB-rbcL IGS for Neocheiropteris and its closely related taxa, totally 14 taxa are sequenced. Phylogenetic trees are constructed with the Maximum-parsimony, Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference method based on coded dataset/non-coded dataset/combined dataset. The division of Neocheiropteris and Neolepisorus is supported by both anatomical and molecular phylogeny evidence. Anatomical research provides support for the division of the two genera by their totally different characters of the division back and vein of frond, and for the close connection of the two genera by their common characters of rhizome scale. Molecular phylogeny research shows that: Neocheiropteris is sister to a clade that includes Tricholepidium and Lepidomicrosorium, and Neolepisorus is sister to the combination of above-mentioned three genera. The taxonomic circumscription and systematic position of Neocheiropteris are investigated by integrating anatomical characters and molecular phylogenetic results, only Neocheiropteris palmatopedata and N.triglossa should be treated as members of Neo-cheiropteris. The systematic position of N.triglossa is investigated based on molecular together with anatomical evidence for the first time.

Key words: Neocheiropteris, Phylogeny, Anatomy, Chloroplast DNA sequences

中图分类号:

Q 949.36

杜新宇1、2 , 成晓1. 中国特有蕨属扇蕨属(水龙骨科)的系统学研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(3): 261-268.

DU Xin-Yu- , CHENG Xiao. Phylogeny of the Chinese Endemic Fern Genus Neocheiropteris (Polypodiaceae)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(3): 261-268.

参考文献

林尤兴, 张宪春, 陆树刚等, 2000. 中国植物志(第6卷第2分册)［M］. 北京: 科学出版社
Bosman MTM, 1991. A monograph of the fern genus Microsorum (Polypodiaceae)［J］. Leiden Botanical Series, 14: 1—161
Ching RC, 1933. The studies of Chinese ferns Ⅸ［J］. Bulletin of the Fan Memorial Institute of Biology, 4 (3): 103—107
Ching RC, 1940. The studies of Chinese ferns ⅩⅩⅩ［J］. Bulletin of the Fan Memorial Institute of Biology, 10 (1): 1—22
Christ H, 1905. Fougeres de Mengtze［J］. Bulletin de l′herbier Boissier, 62 (1): 21—22
Doyle JJ，Doyle JL, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for smal1 quantities of fresh leaf tissue［J］. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19: 11—15
Hasebe M, Worf PG, Pryer KM et al., 1995. Fern phylogeny based on rbcL nucleotide sequences［J］. American Fern Journal, 85 (4): 134—181
Korall P, Pryer KM, Metzgar JS et al., 2006. Tree ferns: Monophyletic groups and their relationships as revealed by four protein-coding plastid loci［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 39: 830—845
Kreier HP, Zhang XC, Muth H et al., 2008. The microsoroid ferns: Inferring the relationships of a highly diverse lineage of Paleotropical epiphytic ferns (Polypodiaceae, Polypodiopsida)［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 48: 1155—1167
Liu HM (刘红梅), Zhang XC (张宪春), Zeng H (曾辉), 2009. Application of DNA Sequences in Pteridophyte Phylogenetic Study［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 44 (2): 143—158
Nadot S, Bittar G, Carter L et al., 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of monocotyledons based on the chloroplast gene rps4, using parsimony and a new numerical phenetics method［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 4: 257—282
Posada D, Crandall KA, 1998. Modeltest : testing the model of DNA substitution［J］. Bioinformatics, 14 (9) : 817─818
Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Wolf PG et al., 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of ferns(monilophytes)with a focus on the early leptosporangiate divergences［J］. American Journal of Botany, 91 (10): 1582—1598
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models［J］. Bioinformatics, 19 (12): 1572─1574
Schneider H, Schuettpelz E, Pryer KM et al., 2004. Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms［J］. Nature, 428: 553—557
Schuettpelz E, Pryer KM, 2007. Fern phylogeny inferred from 400 leptosporangiate species and three plastid genes［J］. Taxon, 56 (4): 1037—1050
Shi L (石雷), Zhang XC (张宪春), 1999. Taxonomic studies of the fern genus Lepidomicrosorum Ching et Shing (Polypodiaceae) from China and neighboring regions［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 37 (5): 509—522
Smith AR, Cranill RB, 2002. Intrafamilial relationships of the Thelypteroid ferns (Thelypteridaceae)［J］. American Fern Journal, 92: 131—149
Swofford DL, 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b10 (Alvitec)［CP］. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer AssociatesTagawa M, 1952. Fern miscellany (6)［J］. The Journal of Japanese Botany, 27 (7): 217─218
Tarberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G et al., 1991. Universal primers for amplification of the three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA［J］. Plant Molacular Biology, 17: 1105—1109
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F et al., 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 25 (24): 4876─4882
Trewick SA,Morgan-Richards M,Russell SJ et al., 2002. Polyploidy phylogeography and Pleistocene refugia of the rockfern Asplenium ceterach: evidence from chloroplast DNA［J］. Molecular Ecology, 11: 2003—2012
Wang L, Qi XP, Xiang QP et al., 2010b. Phylogeny of the paleotropical fern genus Lepisorus (Polypodiaceae, Polypodiopsida) inferred from four chloroplast genome regions［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 54: 211—225
Wang L, Wu ZH, Xiang QP et al., 2010a. A molecular phylogeny and a revised classification of tribe Lepisoreae (Polypodiaceae) based on an analysis of four plastid DNA regions［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 162: 28—38
Wolf PG, 1997. Evaluation of atpB nucleotide sequences for phylogenetic studies of ferns and other Pteridophytes［J］. American Journal of Botany, 84 (10): 1429—1440

[1]	王广艳1、2, 杨永平2、3、4. 天门冬科沿阶草族植物的系统学研究进展[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(4): 365-375.
[2]	杨珍珍1、2, 陈文红1, 税玉民1. 中国和越南秋海棠属种子微形态特征及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(4): 376-388.
[3]	刘栋, 王欣宇, 李建文, 钱子刚, 王立松. 中国横断山的地衣研究 (6)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(06): 781-787.
[4]	曹丽敏, 王志新, 曹明, 刘健晖, 林琼, 夏念和. 中国无患子科植物的叶脉形态及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(04): 419-432.
[5]	董洪进, 彭华. 基于形态和分子证据的大花忍冬复合群的种间关系[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(02): 133-141.
[6]	郗厚诚, 孙瑶, 薛春迎. 基于ITS和matK序列的獐牙菜亚族 (龙胆科龙胆族)分子系统学[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(02): 145-156.
[7]	张玉霄1、2, 许宇星4, 马朋飞1、2, 张丽娜1、2、3, 李德铢1、2. 竹亚科叶绿体DNA条形码筛选[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 743-750.
[8]	孔航辉1, 高乞2, 罗艳3, 杨亲二1. 国产乌头属（毛茛科）的种子形态及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 241-252.
[9]	周卓1、2, 陈光富1、3, 张建文1, 牛洋1, 李志敏3, 孙航1. 蓝钟花属的种子形态学研究及其分类学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 265-272.
[10]	牟凤娟1、4, 李双智1, 徐琼华2, 马士祝3, 张奠湘4. 山小橘属 (芸香科) 花粉形态及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(2): 109-118.
[11]	丁铭, 曾丽萍, 马红, 张宁. 初探低拷贝核基因在低等分类阶元系统发育重建中的适用性——以十字花科为例[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(3): 211-221.
[12]	张明英1、2、3, 陆露1、2, 李德铢1、2, 王红1、2. 小檗科的花粉演化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(01): 1-12.
[13]	谭英1、2, 王智1、3, 隋学艺1、4, 胡光万1. 单种属弥勒苣苔属系统位置研究：基于分子和细胞学数据[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(5): 465-476.
[14]	许腊1、2, 陆露1, 李德铢1, 王红1. 川续断目的花粉演化[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(3): 249-259.
[15]	邵文1, 陆树刚1, 商清春2. 假瘤蕨属 (水龙骨科) 植物叶表皮特征的比较研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(2): 174-182.