Are phylogenies resolved at the genus level appropriate for studies on phylogenetic structure of species assemblages?

doi:10.1016/j.pld.2020.11.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： Phylogenies are essential to studies investigating the effect of evolutionary history on assembly of species in ecological communities and geographical and ecological patterns of phylogenetic structure of species assemblages. Because phylogenies well resolved at the species level are lacking for many major groups of organisms such as vascular plants, researchers often generate a species-level phylogenies using a phylogeny well resolved at the genus level as a backbone and attaching species to their respective genera in the phylogeny as polytomies or by using a megaphylogeny well resolved at the genus level as a backbone and adding additional species to the megaphylogeny as polytomies of their respective genera. However, whether the result of a study using species-level phylogenies generated in these ways is robust, compared to that based on phylogenies fully resolved at the species level, has not been assessed. Here, we use 1093 angiosperm tree assemblages (each in a 110×110km quadrat) in North America as a model system to address this question, by examining six commonly used metrics of phylogenetic structure (phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic relatedness) and six climate variables commonly used in ecology. Our results showed that (1) the scores of phylogenetic metrics derived from species-level phylogenies resolved at the genus level with species being attached to their respective genera as polytomies are very strongly or perfectly correlated to those derived from a phylogeny fully resolved at the species level (the mean of correlation coefficients is 0.973), and (2) the relationships between the scores of phylogenetic metrics and climate variables are consistent between the two sets of analyses based on the two types of phylogeny. Our study suggests that using species-level phylogenies resolved at the genus level with species being attached to their genera as polytomies is appropriate in studies exploring patterns of phylogenetic structure of species in ecological communities across geographical and ecological gradients.

关键词: Genus-level phylogeny, Species-level phylogeny, Phylogenetic diversity, Phylogenetic relatedness, Community phylogenetics, Environmental gradient

Abstract: Phylogenies are essential to studies investigating the effect of evolutionary history on assembly of species in ecological communities and geographical and ecological patterns of phylogenetic structure of species assemblages. Because phylogenies well resolved at the species level are lacking for many major groups of organisms such as vascular plants, researchers often generate a species-level phylogenies using a phylogeny well resolved at the genus level as a backbone and attaching species to their respective genera in the phylogeny as polytomies or by using a megaphylogeny well resolved at the genus level as a backbone and adding additional species to the megaphylogeny as polytomies of their respective genera. However, whether the result of a study using species-level phylogenies generated in these ways is robust, compared to that based on phylogenies fully resolved at the species level, has not been assessed. Here, we use 1093 angiosperm tree assemblages (each in a 110×110km quadrat) in North America as a model system to address this question, by examining six commonly used metrics of phylogenetic structure (phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic relatedness) and six climate variables commonly used in ecology. Our results showed that (1) the scores of phylogenetic metrics derived from species-level phylogenies resolved at the genus level with species being attached to their respective genera as polytomies are very strongly or perfectly correlated to those derived from a phylogeny fully resolved at the species level (the mean of correlation coefficients is 0.973), and (2) the relationships between the scores of phylogenetic metrics and climate variables are consistent between the two sets of analyses based on the two types of phylogeny. Our study suggests that using species-level phylogenies resolved at the genus level with species being attached to their genera as polytomies is appropriate in studies exploring patterns of phylogenetic structure of species in ecological communities across geographical and ecological gradients.

Key words: Genus-level phylogeny, Species-level phylogeny, Phylogenetic diversity, Phylogenetic relatedness, Community phylogenetics, Environmental gradient

Hong Qian, Yi Jin. Are phylogenies resolved at the genus level appropriate for studies on phylogenetic structure of species assemblages?[J]. Plant Diversity, 2021, 43(04): 255-263.

参考文献

Abrahamczyk, S. 2019. Comparison of the ecology and evolution of plants with a generalist bird pollination system between continents and islands worldwide. Biol. Rev. 94, 1658-1671.
Algar, A.C., Kerr, J.T., Currie, D.J. 2009. Evolutionary constraints on regional faunas:whom, but not how many. Ecol. Lett. 12, 57-65.
Baum, D.A., Smith., S.D. 2012. Tree thinking:An introduction to phylogenetic biology. Roberts Co., Greenwood Village, Colorado.
Behrensmeyer, A.K., Damuth, J.D., DiMichele, W.A., et al., 1992. Terrestrial ecosystems through time:evolutionary paleoecology of terrestrial plants and animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Brunbjerg, A.K., Cavender-Bares, J., Eiserhardt, W.L., et al., 2014. Multi-scale phylogenetic structure in coastal dune plant communities across the globe. J. Plant Ecol. 7, 101-114.
Cadotte, M.W., Davies, T.J. 2016. Phylogenies in Ecology:A Guide to Concepts and Methods. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
Carvallo, G.O., Teillier, S., Castro, S.A., et al., 2014. The phylogenetic properties of native- and exotic-dominated plant communities. Austral Ecol. 39, 304-312.
Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K.H., Fine, P.V.A., et al., 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12, 693-715.
Chalmandrier, L., Munkemuller, T., Lavergne, S., et al., 2015. Effects of species' similarity and dominance on the functional and phylogenetic structure of a plant meta-community. Ecology 96, 143-153.
Chen, S.-C., Wu, L.-M., Wang, B., et al., 2020. Macroevolutionary patterns in seed component mass and different evolutionary trajectories across seed desiccation responses. New Phytol. 228, 770-777.
Cooper, N., Rodriguez, J., Purvis, A. 2008. A common tendency for phylogenetic overdispersion in mammalian assemblages. Proc. Roy. Soc.:Biol. Sci. 275, 2031-2037.
Culmsee, H., Leuschner, C. 2013. Consistent patterns of elevational change in tree taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity across Malesian mountain forests. J. Biogeogr. 40, 1997-2010.
Currie, D.J., Paquin, V. 1987. Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329, 326-327.
Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species. Reprinted by Penguin Books, London.
Donoghue, M.J. 2008. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 11549-11555.
Eiserhardt, W.L., Svenning, J.-C., Borchsenius, F., et al., 2013. Separating environmental and geographical determinants of phylogenetic community structure in Amazonian palms (Arecaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 171, 244-259.
Elven, R. 2011. Annotated checklist of the panarctic flora (PAF):vascular plants. National Centre of Biosystematics, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo.
Eme, D., Anderson, M.J., Myers, et al., 2020. Phylogenetic measures reveal eco-evolutionary drivers of biodiversity along a depth gradient. Ecography 43, 689-702.
Emerson, B.C., Gillespie, R.G. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 619-630.
Faith, D.P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1-10.
Fritz, S.A., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Purvis, A. 2009. Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk:big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol. Lett. 12, 538-554.
Fritz, S.A., Rahbek, C. 2012. Global patterns of amphibian phylogenetic diversity. J. Biogeogr. 39, 1373-1382.
Gamba, D., Muchhala, N. 2020. Global patterns of population genetic differentiation in seed plants. Mol. Ecol. 29, 3413-3428.
Giehl, E.L.H., Jarenkow, J.A. 2012. Niche conservatism and the differences in species richness at the transition of tropical and subtropical climates in South America. Ecography 35, 933-943.
Graham, A. 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation north of Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York.
Hardy, O.J., Couteron, P., Munoz, F., et al., 2012. Phylogenetic turnover in tropical tree communities:impact of environmental filtering, biogeography and mesoclimatic niche conservatism. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 1007-1016.
Hawkins, B.A., Rueda, M., Rangel, T.F., et al., 2014. Community phylogenetics at the biogeographical scale:cold tolerance, niche conservatism and the structure of North American forests. J. Biogeogr. 41, 23-38.
Jetz, W., Thomas, G.H., Joy, J.B., et al., 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444-448.
Jin, Y., Qian, H. 2019. V.PhyloMaker:an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353-1359.
Kamilar, J.M., Guidi, L.M. 2010. The phylogenetic structure of primate communities:variation within and across continents. J. Biogeogr. 37, 801-813.
Kamilar, J.M., Beaudrot, L., Reed, K.E. 2015. Climate and species richness predict the phylogenetic structure of African mammal communities. PLoS ONE 10, e0121808.
Lancaster, L.T. 2020. Host use diversification during range shifts shapes global variation in Lepidopteran dietary breadth. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 963-969.
Lehtonen, S., Jones, M.M., Zuquim, G., et al., 2015. Phylogenetic relatedness within Neotropical fern communities increases with soil fertility. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 695-705.
Li, X., Sun, H. 2017. Phylogenetic pattern of alpine plants along latitude and longitude in Hengduan Mountains Region. Plant Divers. 39, 37-43.
Little, E.L., Jr. 1971-78. Atlas of United States trees. Vols. 1, 3, 4, and 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication, Washington, DC.
Mabberley, D.J. 2008. Mabberley's Plant-book A Portable Dictionary of Plants, their Classifications, and Uses, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Molina-Venegas, R., Aparicio, A., Slingsby, J.A., et al., 2015. Investigating the evolutionary assembly of a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot:deep phylogenetic signal in the distribution of eudicots across elevational belts. J. Biogeogr. 42, 507-518.
Morin, X., Lechowicz, M.J. 2011. Geographical and ecological patterns of range size in North American trees. Ecography 34, 738-750.
Munguia-Rosas, M.A., Ollerton, J., Parra-Tabla, V., et al., 2011. Meta-analysis of phenotypic selection on flowering phenology suggests that early flowering plants are favoured. Ecol. Lett. 14, 511-521.
Ndiribe, C., Salamin, N., Guisan, A. 2013. Understanding the concepts of community phylogenetics. Evol. Ecol. Res. 15, 853-868.
Pennington, R.T., Richardson, J.E., Lavin, M. 2006. Insights into the historical construction of species-rich biomes from dated plant phylogenies, neutral ecological theory and phylogenetic community structure. New Phytol. 172, 605-616.
Qian, H., Jiang, L. 2014. Phylogenetic community ecology:integrating community ecology and evolutionary biology. J. Plant Ecol. 7, 97-100.
Qian, H., Ricklefs, R.E. 2016. Out of the tropical lowlands:latitude versus elevation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 738-741.
Qian, H., Wiens, J.J., Zhang, J., et al., 2015. Evolutionary and ecological causes of species richness patterns in North American angiosperm trees. Ecography 38, 241-250.
Qian, H., Deng, T., Jin, Y., et al., 2019. Phylogenetic dispersion and diversity in regional assemblages of seed plants in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 23192-23201.
Qian, H., Jin, Y., Ricklefs, R.E. 2017. Phylogenetic diversity anomaly in angiosperms between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 11452-11457.
Qian, H., Hao, Z., Zhang, J. 2014. Phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic diversity of angiosperm assemblages in forests along an elevational gradient in Changbaishan, China. J. Plant Ecol. 7, 154-165.
Qian, H., Zhang, J. 2016. Are phylogenies derived from family-level supertrees robust for studies on macroecological patterns along environmental gradients? J. Syst. Evol. 54, 29-36.
Qian, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., et al., 2013. Latitudinal gradients in phylogenetic relatedness of angiosperm trees in North America. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 1183-1191.
Rana, S.K., Price, T.D., Qian., H. 2019. Plant species richness across the Himalaya driven by evolutionary history and current climate. Ecosphere 10, Article e02945.
Ricklefs, R.E. 1987. Community diversity:relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235, 167-171.
Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew 2016. The state of the World's Plants 2016. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Sandel, B., Tsirogiannis, C. 2016. Species introductions and the phylogenetic and functional structure of California's grasses. Ecology 97, 472-483.
Sandel, B., Weigelt, P., Kreft, H., et al., 2020. Current climate, isolation and history drive global patterns of tree phylogenetic endemism. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 4-15.
Smith, S.A., Brown, J.W. 2018. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302-314.
Swenson, N.G. 2019. Phylogenetic Ecology:A History, Critique, and Remodeling. University of Chicago Press.
Tsirogiannis, C., Sandel, B. 2016. PhyloMeasures:a package for computing phylogenetic biodiversity measures and their statistical moments. Ecography 39, 709-714.
Vamosi, S.M., Heard, S.B., Vamosi, J.C., et al., 2009. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 18, 572-592.
Webb, C.O. 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities:an example for rain forest trees. Am. Nat. 156, 145-155.
Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., Kembel, S.W. 2008. Phylocom:software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24, 2098-2100.
Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPeek, M.A., et al., 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475-505.
Webb, C.O., Losos, J.B., Agrawal, A.A. 2006. Integrating phylogenies into community ecology. Ecology 87, S1-S2.
Weigelt, P., Kissling, W.D., Kisel, Y., et al., 2015. Global patterns and drivers of phylogenetic structure in island floras. Sci. Rep. 5, 12213.
Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., Welna, J.P., et al., 1992. SYSTAT for Windows:statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston.
Yue, J., Li, R. 2020. Phylogenetic relatedness of woody angiosperm assemblages and its environmental determinants along a subtropical elevational gradient in China. Plant Divers. DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2020.08.003.
Zanne, A.E., Tank, D.C., Cornwell, W.K., et al., 2014. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89-92.
Zhang, Y., Qian, L., Spalink, D., et al., 2020. Spatial phylogenetics of two topographic extremes of the Hengduan Mountains in southwestern China and its implications for biodiversity conservation. Plant Divers. DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2020.09.001.

[1]	Hong Qian, Shenhua Qian. Geographic patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversity of angiosperm genera in regional floras across the world[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 491-500.
[2]	Hong Qian. Intercontinental comparison of phylogenetic relatedness in introduced plants at the transition from naturalization to invasion: A case study on the floras of South Africa and China[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(04): 363-368.
[3]	Yi Jin, Hong Qian. U.PhyloMaker:An R package that can generate large phylogenetic trees for plants and animals[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(03): 347-352.
[4]	Hong Qian, Jian Zhang, Meichen Jiang. Global patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of flowering plants:Biodiversity hotspots and coldspots[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(03): 265-271.
[5]	Han-Yang Lin, Miao Sun, Ya-Jun Hao, Daijiang Li, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Cheng-Xin Fu, Douglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, Yun-Peng Zhao. Phylogenetic diversity of eastern Asia-eastern North America disjunct plants is mainly associated with divergence time[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(01): 27-35.
[6]	Yi Jin, Hong Qian. V.PhyloMaker2：An updated and enlarged R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants[J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(04): 335-339.
[7]	Ya-Zhou Zhang, Li-Shen Qian, Xu-Fang Chen, Lu Sun, Hang Sun, Jian-Guo Chen. Diversity patterns of cushion plants on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A basic study for future conservation efforts on alpine ecosystems[J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(03): 231-242.