基于ITS和matK序列的獐牙菜亚族 (龙胆科龙胆族)分子系统学

doi:10.7677/ynzwyj201413080

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨獐牙菜亚族（subtribe Swertiinae）各属之间和一些属内的系统关系，本研究选取了该亚族14属68种1变种，采用最大简约法（maximum parsimony）和贝叶斯法（Bayesian inference）对样品核基因ITS和叶绿体基因matK的两个片段进行独立和联合分析。结果显示：Bartonia位于亚族的最基部；喉毛花属（Comastoma）、肋柱花属（Lomatogonium）和假龙胆属（Gentianella）都非单系，处于同一个较为进化的分支中；獐牙菜属折皱组（Swertia sect. Rugosa）和獐牙菜组（S. sect. Swertia）亲缘关系最近，宽丝组（S. sect. Platynema）和藏獐牙菜组（S. sect. KingdonWardia）亲缘关系最近；口药花属（Jaeschkea）与獐牙菜属多枝组（S. sect. Ophelia）的大籽獐牙菜（Smacrosperma）亲缘关系最近。同时讨论了獐牙菜亚族形态分类与分子数据不一致的原因。

关键词: 獐牙菜亚族, 系统学, ITS, matK, 龙胆科

Abstract:

To understand the intergeneric relationships in GentianaceaeSwertiinae and some infrageneric phylogeney, a total of 68 species and 1 variant of 14 genera were performed with maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference methods based on the sequences of the nrDNA ITS and chloroplast DNA matK regions. The results revealed that Swertiinae is monophyletic and Bartonia is determined as the most basal genus; Comastoma, Lomatogonium and Gentianella are not monophyletic and are located in one more derived clade; in Swertia, S. sect. Rugosa and S. sect. Swertia, also S. sect. Platynema and S. sect. KingdonWardia are most closely related; Jaeschkea is most closely related to Smacrosperma. Further more, the incongruence between the phylogeny were discussed based on the morphological and molecular data.

Key words: Swertiinae, Phylogeny, ITS, matK, Gentianaceae

中图分类号:

Q 781
Q 949

郗厚诚, 孙瑶, 薛春迎. 基于ITS和matK序列的獐牙菜亚族 (龙胆科龙胆族)分子系统学[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(02): 145-156.

XI Hou-Cheng, SUN Yao, XUE Chun-Ying. Molecular Phylogeny of Swertiinae (GentianaceaeGentianeae) Based on Sequence Data of ITS and matK[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(02): 145-156.

参考文献

何廷农, 刘尚武, 吴庆如, 1988. 中国植物志 (第62卷) ［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 287—411
Brakefield PM, 2006. Evodevo and constraints on selection［J］. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21 (7): 362—368
Bremer B, Struwe L, 1992. Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: Congruence of conflict between morphological and molecular data?［J］. American Journal of Botany, 79 (10): 1171—1184
Chassot P, Nemomissa S, Yuan YM et al., 2001. High paraphyly of Swertia L. (Gentianaceae) in the Gentianellalineage as revealed by nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence variation［J］. Plant Systematic and Evolution, 229: 1—21
Cuénoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW et al., 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences［J］. American Journal of Botany, 89 (1): 132—144
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue［J］. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19: 11—15
Draper I, Hedens L, Grimm GW, 2007. Molecular and morphological incongruence in European species of Isothecium (Bryophyta) ［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 42 (3): 700—716
Funk DJ, Omland KE, 2003. Specieslevel paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA［J］. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Evolution, 34: 397—423
Hedens L, Eldens P, 2008. Relationships in Scorpidium (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta), especially between Scossonii and Sscorpioides［J］. Taxon, 57 (1): 121—130
Ho TN, Liu SW, 1990. The infrageneric classification of Gentiana (Gentianaceae) ［J］. Bulletin of the British Museum. Natural History Botany, 20: 169—192
Ho TN (何廷农), Xue CY (薛春迎), Wang W (王伟), 1994. The origin, dispersal and formation of the distribution pattern of Swertia L. (Gentianaceae) ［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 32 (6): 525—537
Hoekstra HE, Hirschmann RJ, Bundey RA et al., 2006. A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern［J］. Science, 313 (5783): 101—104
Irestedt M, Fjeldsa J, Ericson PGP, 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptinae)/incongruence between molecular and morphological data［J］. Journal of Avian Biology, 35 (3): 280—288
Kadereit JW, von Hagen KB, 2003. The evolution of flower morphology in GentianaceaeSwertiinae and the roles of key innovations and niche width for the diversification of Gentianella and Halenia in South America［J］. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164 (5): 441—452
Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown N et al., 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X Version 20［J］. Bioinformatics, 23 (21): 2947—2948
Lee MSY, 2001. Uninformative characters and apparent conflict between molecules and morphology［J］. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18 (4): 676—680
Pisani D, Benton MJ, Wilkinson M, 2007. Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies［J］. Acta Biotheoretica, 55 (3): 269—281
Posada D, Crandall KA, 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution［J］. Bioinformatics, 14 (9): 817—818
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models［J］. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572—1574
Shah J, 1992. Taxonomic studies in the genus Swertia L. (Gentianaceae),monograph part 2［J］.Science Khyber,5:127—231
Shaw AJ, 2009. Bryophyte species and speciation［A］. In: Goffinet B, ShawJ (eds.), Bryophyte Biology, 2nd edn［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 445—485
Stenoien HK, 2008. Slow molecular evolution in 18S rDNA, rbcL and nad5 genes of mosses compared with higher plants［J］. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21 (2): 566—571
Struwe L, Kadereit JW, Klackenberg J et al., 2002. Systematics, character evolution, and biogeography of Gentianaceae, including a new tribal and subtribal classification［A］. In: Struwe L, Albert VA (eds.), Gentianaceae, Systematics and Natural History［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21—309
Swofford DL, 2002. PAUP*40b10: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods) beta version［CP］. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc
von Hagen KB, Kadereit JW, 2002. Phylogeny and flower evolution of the Swertiinae (GentianaceaeGentianeae): Homoplasy and the principle of variable proportions［J］. Systematic Botany, 27: 548—572
Wen J, Zimmer EA, 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the Ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS Sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 6 (2): 167—177
Wood CE, Weaver RE, 1982. The genera of Gentianaceae in the southeastern United States［J］. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 63(4): 441—487
Xue CY, Ho TN, Li DZ, 2007. Embryology of Swertia (Gentianaceae) relative to taxonomy［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 155 (3): 383—400
Yuan YM, Küpfer P, 1995. Molecular phylogenetics of the subtribe Gentianinae (Gentianaceae) inferred from the sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA［J］. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 196: 207—226

[1]	Ming-Yue Jin, Daniel J. Johnson, Guang-Ze Jin, Qing-Xi Guo, Zhi-Li Liu. Soil water content and nitrogen differentially correlate with multidimensional leaf traits of two temperate broadleaf species[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(06): 694-701.
[2]	Yan Ke, Feng-Ping Zhang, Yun-Bing Zhang, Wei Li, Qin Wang, Da Yang, Jiao-Lin Zhang, Kun-Fang Cao. Convergent relationships between flower economics and hydraulic traits across aquatic and terrestrial herbaceous plants[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 601-610.
[3]	Amarpreet Kaur, Shalinder Kaur, Harminder Pal Singh, Daizy R. Batish. Is intraspecific trait differentiation in Parthenium hysterophorus a consequence of hereditary factors and/or phenotypic plasticity?[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 611-620.
[4]	Korina Ocampo-Zuleta, Ángela Parrado-Rosselli. Functional diversity in an Andean subpáramo affected by wildfire in Colombia[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(04): 385-396.
[5]	Harshita Bhatia, Gaurav Srivastava, R. C. Mehrotra. Legumes from the Paleocene sediments of India and their ecological significance[J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(02): 199-210.
[6]	Chao Liu, Huan-Huan Chen, Li-Zhou Tang, Phyo Kay Khine, Li-Hong Han, Yu Song, Yun-Hong Tan. Plastid genome evolution of a monophyletic group in the subtribe Lauriineae (Laureae, Lauraceae)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(04): 377-388.
[7]	Guo-Qiang Zhang, Gui-Zhen Chen, Li-Jun Chen, Jun-Wen Zhai, Jie Huang, Xin-Yi Wu, Ming-He Li, Dong-Hui Peng, Wen-Hui Rao, Zhong-Jian Liu, Si-Ren Lan. Phylogenetic incongruence in Cymbidium orchids[J]. Plant Diversity, 2021, 43(06): 452-461.
[8]	Feng-Ping Zhang, Jiao-Lin Zhang, Timothy J. Brodribb, Hong Hu. Cavitation resistance of peduncle, petiole and stem is correlated with bordered pit dimensions in Magnolia grandiflora[J]. Plant Diversity, 2021, 43(04): 324-330.
[9]	Kai-Wen Jiang, Rong Zhang, Zhong-Fu Zhang, Bo Pan, Bin Tian. DNA barcoding and molecular phylogeny of Dumasia (Fabaceae: Phaseoleae) reveals a cryptic lineage[J]. Plant Diversity, 2020, 42(05): 376-385.
[10]	Ji-Hua Wang, Yan-Fei Cai, Shi-Feng Li, Shi-Bao Zhang. Differences in leaf physiological and morphological traits between Camellia japonica and Camellia reticulata[J]. Plant Diversity, 2020, 42(03): 181-188.
[11]	Ting-Ting Zhang, Na-Yao Zhang, Wei Li, Xiao-Jian Zhou, Xiao-Yu Pei, Yan-Gai Liu, Zhong-Ying Ren, Kun-Lun He, Wen-Sheng Zhang, Ke-Hai Zhou, Fei Zhang, Xiong-Feng Ma, Dai-Gang Yang, Zhong-Hu Li. Genetic structure, gene flow pattern, and association analysis of superior germplasm resources in domesticated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Plant Diversity, 2020, 42(03): 189-197.
[12]	Wumei Xu, Kyle W. Tomlinson, Jie Li. Strong intraspecific trait variation in a tropical dominant tree species along an elevational gradient[J]. Plant Diversity, 2020, 42(01): 1-6.
[13]	Ashley M. Matheny, Golnazalsadat Mirfenderesgi, Gil Bohrer. Trait-based representation of hydrological functional properties of plants in weather and ecosystem models[J]. Plant Diversity, 2017, 39(01): 1-12.
[14]	王广艳1、2, 杨永平2、3、4. 天门冬科沿阶草族植物的系统学研究进展[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(4): 365-375.
[15]	杨珍珍1、2, 陈文红1, 税玉民1. 中国和越南秋海棠属种子微形态特征及其系统学意义[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(4): 376-388.