杨树和葡萄UBX蛋白质家族分析

doi:10.7677/ynzwyj201413146

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

UBX（泛素调控X因子）蛋白质家族在泛素化相关的过程中起着重要的作用，如细胞周期调控、转录调控、信号转导、发育、胁迫响应、细胞程序性死亡、内吞作用和DNA修复。然而，到目前为止，UBX家族在杨树和葡萄中还没有被研究过。为了更好的弄清这两个植物的UBX家族，我们对UBX的基因结构、染色体位置、基因重复、系统发育关系作了分析。该研究对葡萄和杨树的UBX蛋白质家族作了第一个系统的分析。基因的外显子/内含子结构和蛋白质基序组成在同一个组里相对比较保守。基因重复分析表明，串联重复和片段重复对于杨树和葡萄的UBX基因家族的扩张有一定贡献，基因缺失在UBX基因家族的扩张过程中也发生了作用。本研究为UBX蛋白质功能的研究奠定了基础。

关键词: 泛素调控X因子, 基因结构, 基因重复, 系统发育

Abstract:

The UBX (Ubiquitin regulatory X) protein family plays important roles in ubiquitinrelated processes including cellcycle control, transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, development, stress response, programmed cell death, endocytosis and DNA repair. However, this family has not been studied to date in Populus and Vitis. To better understand the UBX in these two plants, relevant analyses about gene structure, chromosomal location, duplication, phylogenetic relationships were performed. Our study provides the first systematic analysis of the Vitis and Populus UBX proteins. The exon/intron gene structure and motif composition were relatively conserved in the same group. Duplication analyses suggested that tandem duplication and segmental duplication contribute to the expansion of Populus and Vitis UBX gene family, while some gene loss has also occurred. The results presented basic information on UBX proteins, which may show a scaffold for future functional analysis of this family.

Key words: UBX, Gene structure, Gene duplication, Phylogeny

中图分类号:

Q 75

刘德团, 曹军, 许琨. 杨树和葡萄UBX蛋白质家族分析[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(03): 349-357.

LIU De-Tuan, CAO Jun, XU Kun. Analyses of the UBX Protein Family in Populus and Vitis[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(03): 349-357.

参考文献

Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C et al., 2006. MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 34 (2): 369—373
Bednarek S, 2009. Role of AtCDC48 & the AtCDC48 Regulatory Protein Family, PUX, in Plant Cell Morphogenesis［R］. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Boyer JS, 1982. Plant productivity and environment［J］. Science, 218 (4571): 443—448
Buchberger A, 2002. From UBA to UBX: new words in the ubiquitin vocabulary［J］. Trends in Cell Biology, 12 (5): 216—221
Buchberger A, Howard MJ, Proctor M et al., 2001. The UBX domain: a widespread ubiquitinlike module［J］. Journal of Molecular Biology, 307 (1): 17—24
Cannon SB, Mitra A, Baumgarten A et al., 2004. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana［J］. BMC Plant Biology, 4(1): 10—30
Cao J, Huang JL, Yang YP et al., 2011. Analyses of the oligopeptide transporter gene family in poplar and grape［J］. BMC Genomics, 12 (1): 465—476
Chen A, He S, Li F et al., 2012. Analyses of the sucrose synthase gene family in cotton: structure, phylogeny and expression patterns［J］. BMC Plant Biology, 12 (1): 85—101
Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM et al., 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator［J］. Genome Research, 14 (6): 1188—1190
Dreher K, Callis J, 2007. Ubiquitin, hormones and biotic stress in plants［J］. Annals of Botany, 99 (5): 787—822
Gaut BS, Morton BR, McCaig BC et al., 1996. Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93 (19): 10274—10279
Ghislain M, Dohmen RJ, Levy F et al., 1996. Cdc48p interacts with Ufd3p, a WD repeat protein required for ubiquitinmediated proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae［J］. The EMBO Journal, 15 (18): 4884—4899
Gray WM, 2004. Hormonal regulation of plant growth and development［J］. PLOS Biology, 2 (9): 1270—1273
Guo AY (郭安源), Zhu QH (朱其慧), Chen X (陈新) et al., 2007. GSDS: a gene structure display server［J］. Hereditas (Beijing) (遗传), 29 (8): 1023—1026
Hershko A, Ciechanover A, 1998. The ubiquitin system［J］.Annual Review of Biochemistry, 67 (1): 425—479
Jaillon O, Aury J M, Noel B et al., 2007. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla［J］. Nature, 449 (7161): 463—467
Kloppsteck P, Ewens CA, Frster A et al., 2012. Regulation of p97 in the ubiquitinproteasome system by the UBX proteinfamily［J］.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)Molecular Cell Research, 1823 (1): 125—129
Kong H, Landherr LL, Frohlich MW et al., 2007. Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth［J］. The Plant Journal, 50 (5): 873—885
LaLonde DP, Bretscher A, 2011. The UBX protein SAKS1 negatively regulates endoplasmic reticulumassociated degradation and p97dependent degradation［J］. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286 (6): 4892—4901
Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P, 2012. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 40 (D1): 302—305
Licausi F, Giorgi FM, Zenoni S et al., 2010. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of the AP2/ERF superfamily in Vitis vinifera［J］. BMC Genomics, 11 (1): 719—734
Lynch M, Conery JS, 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes［J］. Science, 290 (5494): 1151—1155
Orme CM, Bogan JS, 2012. The ubiquitin regulatory X (UBX) domaincontaining protein TUG regulates the p97 ATPase and resides at the endoplasmic reticulumGolgi intermediate compartment［J］. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287 (9): 6679—6692
Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY et al., 2012. The Pfam protein families database［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 40 (1): 290—301
Rmisch K, 2006. Cdc48p is UBXlinked to ER ubiquitin ligases［J］. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 31 (1): 24—25
Schneider TD, Stephens RM, 1990. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 18 (20): 6097—6100
Schuberth C, Buchberger A, 2005. Membranebound Ubx2 recruits Cdc48 to ubiquitin ligases and their substrates to ensure efficient ERassociated protein degradation［J］. Nature Cell Biology, 7 (10): 999—1006
Schuberth C, Buchberger A, 2008. UBX domain proteins: major regulators of the AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97［J］.Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 65 (15): 2360—2371
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N et al., 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods［J］. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28 (10): 2731—2739
Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S et al., 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) ［J］. Science, 313 (5793): 1596—1604
Wang CW, Lee SC, 2012. The ubiquitinlike (UBX)domaincontaining protein Ubx2/Ubxd8 regulates lipid droplet homeostasis［J］. Journal of Cell Science, 125 (12): 2930—2939

[1]	高聪聪1、2, 倪军1、3, 陈茂盛1、2, 徐增富1. 能源植物小桐子赤霉素合成代谢及信号转导相关基因的鉴定及序列分析[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(2): 157-167.
[2]	王华芳1、2, 杨石建3, 张教林1. 热带木质藤本的根压及其与系统发育和环境的关系[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(06): 751-759.
[3]	杨汉奇, 李德铢. 中国竹亚科空竹属的整理[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(05): 546-550.
[4]	卢萍, 高利霞, 金凤, 恩和巴雅尔. 基于psbAtrnH序列的十种棘豆属植物分子系统学研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(03): 279-284.
[5]	赵旭耀, 陈斯云, 赵磊, 张雪梅, 马朋飞, 郭振华. MIR166基因家族在陆生植物中的进化模式分析[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(03): 331-341.
[6]	罗亚皇1、2、3、4, 刘杰1, 高连明1**, 李德铢1、2. DNA条形码在生态学研究中的应用与展望[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 761-768.
[7]	杜燕, 张挺, 蔡杰, 杨湘云. iFlora中的种子形态学信息[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 774-778.
[8]	李恒1、3, 普建新2, 李捷1. 唇形科香茶菜属二萜类化合物分布规律[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(1): 81-88.
[9]	骆洋1、2、5, 何延彪3, 李德铢1、2, 王雨华3、4, 伊廷双2, 王红1、2. 中国植物志、Flora of China和维管植物新系统中科的比较[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(3): 231-238.
[10]	汤晓辛1、2, 黄双全1. 花色多样性与变异的研究进展[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(3): 239-247.
[11]	裴男才. 利用植物DNA条形码构建亚热带森林群落系统发育关系——以鼎湖山样地为例[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(3): 263-270.
[12]	凌立贞1、2, 张书东1. miR156靶基因SPL在植物中的系统分布和进化模式分析[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(01): 33-46.
[13]	张韵洁, 李德铢. 叶绿体系统发育基因组学的研究进展[J]. Plant Diversity, 2011, 33(4): 365-375.
[14]	卫然1、2, 张宪春1, 齐新萍1、2、3. 肠蕨属和同囊蕨属的系统位置——基于叶绿体rbcL基因和rps4+rps4trnS基因间隔区序列的证据[J]. Plant Diversity, 2010, 32(S17): 46-54.
[15]	梁冠欣1,2, , 邢福武1. 堇菜属组间的系统发育与亲缘关系：基于trnL-trnF、psbAtrnH、rpL16、ITS序列，细胞学以及形态学证据[J]. Plant Diversity, 2010, 32(6): 477-488.