Molecular Phylogeny of Swertiinae (GentianaceaeGentianeae) Based on Sequence Data of ITS and matK

doi:10.7677/ynzwyj201413080

Abstract

Abstract:

To understand the intergeneric relationships in GentianaceaeSwertiinae and some infrageneric phylogeney, a total of 68 species and 1 variant of 14 genera were performed with maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference methods based on the sequences of the nrDNA ITS and chloroplast DNA matK regions. The results revealed that Swertiinae is monophyletic and Bartonia is determined as the most basal genus; Comastoma, Lomatogonium and Gentianella are not monophyletic and are located in one more derived clade; in Swertia, S. sect. Rugosa and S. sect. Swertia, also S. sect. Platynema and S. sect. KingdonWardia are most closely related; Jaeschkea is most closely related to Smacrosperma. Further more, the incongruence between the phylogeny were discussed based on the morphological and molecular data.

Key words: Swertiinae, Phylogeny, ITS, matK, Gentianaceae

CLC Number:

Q 781
Q 949

XI Hou-Cheng, SUN Yao, XUE Chun-Ying. Molecular Phylogeny of Swertiinae (GentianaceaeGentianeae) Based on Sequence Data of ITS and matK[J]. Plant Diversity, 2014, 36(02): 145-156.

References

何廷农, 刘尚武, 吴庆如, 1988. 中国植物志 (第62卷) ［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 287—411
Brakefield PM, 2006. Evodevo and constraints on selection［J］. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21 (7): 362—368
Bremer B, Struwe L, 1992. Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: Congruence of conflict between morphological and molecular data?［J］. American Journal of Botany, 79 (10): 1171—1184
Chassot P, Nemomissa S, Yuan YM et al., 2001. High paraphyly of Swertia L. (Gentianaceae) in the Gentianellalineage as revealed by nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence variation［J］. Plant Systematic and Evolution, 229: 1—21
Cuénoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW et al., 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences［J］. American Journal of Botany, 89 (1): 132—144
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue［J］. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19: 11—15
Draper I, Hedens L, Grimm GW, 2007. Molecular and morphological incongruence in European species of Isothecium (Bryophyta) ［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 42 (3): 700—716
Funk DJ, Omland KE, 2003. Specieslevel paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA［J］. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Evolution, 34: 397—423
Hedens L, Eldens P, 2008. Relationships in Scorpidium (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta), especially between Scossonii and Sscorpioides［J］. Taxon, 57 (1): 121—130
Ho TN, Liu SW, 1990. The infrageneric classification of Gentiana (Gentianaceae) ［J］. Bulletin of the British Museum. Natural History Botany, 20: 169—192
Ho TN (何廷农), Xue CY (薛春迎), Wang W (王伟), 1994. The origin, dispersal and formation of the distribution pattern of Swertia L. (Gentianaceae) ［J］. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报), 32 (6): 525—537
Hoekstra HE, Hirschmann RJ, Bundey RA et al., 2006. A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern［J］. Science, 313 (5783): 101—104
Irestedt M, Fjeldsa J, Ericson PGP, 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptinae)/incongruence between molecular and morphological data［J］. Journal of Avian Biology, 35 (3): 280—288
Kadereit JW, von Hagen KB, 2003. The evolution of flower morphology in GentianaceaeSwertiinae and the roles of key innovations and niche width for the diversification of Gentianella and Halenia in South America［J］. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164 (5): 441—452
Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown N et al., 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X Version 20［J］. Bioinformatics, 23 (21): 2947—2948
Lee MSY, 2001. Uninformative characters and apparent conflict between molecules and morphology［J］. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18 (4): 676—680
Pisani D, Benton MJ, Wilkinson M, 2007. Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies［J］. Acta Biotheoretica, 55 (3): 269—281
Posada D, Crandall KA, 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution［J］. Bioinformatics, 14 (9): 817—818
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models［J］. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572—1574
Shah J, 1992. Taxonomic studies in the genus Swertia L. (Gentianaceae),monograph part 2［J］.Science Khyber,5:127—231
Shaw AJ, 2009. Bryophyte species and speciation［A］. In: Goffinet B, ShawJ (eds.), Bryophyte Biology, 2nd edn［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 445—485
Stenoien HK, 2008. Slow molecular evolution in 18S rDNA, rbcL and nad5 genes of mosses compared with higher plants［J］. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21 (2): 566—571
Struwe L, Kadereit JW, Klackenberg J et al., 2002. Systematics, character evolution, and biogeography of Gentianaceae, including a new tribal and subtribal classification［A］. In: Struwe L, Albert VA (eds.), Gentianaceae, Systematics and Natural History［M］. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21—309
Swofford DL, 2002. PAUP*40b10: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods) beta version［CP］. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc
von Hagen KB, Kadereit JW, 2002. Phylogeny and flower evolution of the Swertiinae (GentianaceaeGentianeae): Homoplasy and the principle of variable proportions［J］. Systematic Botany, 27: 548—572
Wen J, Zimmer EA, 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the Ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS Sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 6 (2): 167—177
Wood CE, Weaver RE, 1982. The genera of Gentianaceae in the southeastern United States［J］. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 63(4): 441—487
Xue CY, Ho TN, Li DZ, 2007. Embryology of Swertia (Gentianaceae) relative to taxonomy［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 155 (3): 383—400
Yuan YM, Küpfer P, 1995. Molecular phylogenetics of the subtribe Gentianinae (Gentianaceae) inferred from the sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA［J］. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 196: 207—226

[1]	Xin-Mao Zhou, Li-Bing Zhang. Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Selaginellaceae(lycophytes) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(06): 630-684.
[2]	Ming-Yue Jin, Daniel J. Johnson, Guang-Ze Jin, Qing-Xi Guo, Zhi-Li Liu. Soil water content and nitrogen differentially correlate with multidimensional leaf traits of two temperate broadleaf species [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(06): 694-701.
[3]	Zhe Chen, Zhuo Zhou, Ze-Min Guo, Truong Van Do, Hang Sun, Yang Niu. Historical development of karst evergreen broadleaved forests in East Asia has shaped the evolution of a hemiparasitic genus Brandisia (Orobanchaceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 501-512.
[4]	Hai-Su Hu, Jiu-Yang Mao, Xue Wang, Yu-Ze Liang, Bei Jiang, De-Quan Zhang. Plastid phylogenomics and species discrimination in the “Chinese” clade of Roscoea (Zingiberaceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 523-534.
[5]	Yan Ke, Feng-Ping Zhang, Yun-Bing Zhang, Wei Li, Qin Wang, Da Yang, Jiao-Lin Zhang, Kun-Fang Cao. Convergent relationships between flower economics and hydraulic traits across aquatic and terrestrial herbaceous plants [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 601-610.
[6]	Amarpreet Kaur, Shalinder Kaur, Harminder Pal Singh, Daizy R. Batish. Is intraspecific trait differentiation in Parthenium hysterophorus a consequence of hereditary factors and/or phenotypic plasticity? [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(05): 611-620.
[7]	Korina Ocampo-Zuleta, Ángela Parrado-Rosselli. Functional diversity in an Andean subpáramo affected by wildfire in Colombia [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(04): 385-396.
[8]	Yu-Feng Gu, Jiang-Ping Shu, Yi-Jun Lu, Hui Shen, Wen Shao, Yan Zhou, Qi-Meng Sun, Jian-Bing Chen, Bao-Dong Liu, Yue-Hong Yan. Insights into cryptic speciation of quillworts in China [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(03): 284-301.
[9]	Yi Jin, Hong Qian. U.PhyloMaker:An R package that can generate large phylogenetic trees for plants and animals [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(03): 347-352.
[10]	Harshita Bhatia, Gaurav Srivastava, R. C. Mehrotra. Legumes from the Paleocene sediments of India and their ecological significance [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(02): 199-210.
[11]	Xing Liu, Hui-Min Cai, Wen-Qiao Wang, Wei Lin, Zhi-Wei Su, Zhong-Hui Ma. Why is the beautyberry so colourful? Evolution, biogeography, and diversification of fruit colours in Callicarpa (Lamiaceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(01): 6-19.
[12]	Mei-Zhen Wang, Xiao-Kai Fan, Yong-Hua Zhang, Jing Wu, Li-Mi Mao, Sheng-Lu Zhang, Min-Qi Cai, Ming-Hong Li, Zhang-Shi-Chang Zhu, Ming-Shui Zhao, Lu-Xian Liu, Kenneth M. Cameron, Pan Li. Phylogenomics and integrative taxonomy reveal two new species of Amana (Liliaceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2023, 45(01): 54-68.
[13]	Hong-Hu Meng, Can-Yu Zhang, Shook Ling Low, Lang Li, Jian-Yong Shen, Nurainas, Yu Zhang, Pei-Han Huang, Shi-Shun Zhou, Yun-Hong Tan, Jie Li. Two new species from Sulawesi and Borneo facilitate phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Engelhardia (Juglandaceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(06): 552-564.
[14]	Yi Jin, Hong Qian. V.PhyloMaker2：An updated and enlarged R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants [J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(04): 335-339.
[15]	Chao Liu, Huan-Huan Chen, Li-Zhou Tang, Phyo Kay Khine, Li-Hong Han, Yu Song, Yun-Hong Tan. Plastid genome evolution of a monophyletic group in the subtribe Lauriineae (Laureae, Lauraceae) [J]. Plant Diversity, 2022, 44(04): 377-388.