结合叶绿体和核DNA序列变异可提高云杉属物种的分子鉴别率

doi:10.7677/ynzwyj201313083

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

松科(Pinaceae)云杉属(Picea)植物是北半球广泛分布的重要森林树种，由于频繁的种间杂交渐渗及近期的辐射分化导致种间形态趋同，传统的形态学方法很难准确鉴定该属物种。近期兴起和发展的DNA条形码技术为云杉属物种的划分和鉴定提供了可参考的方法。在云杉属青藏高原种质资源收集过程完成后，选取5个叶绿体DNA片段(matK，rbcL，trnHpsbA，trnLtrnF和trnStrnG)以及3个核DNA片段(4CL，Sb29和GI)，利用PWGdistance和TreeBuilding两种方法对青藏高原以及中国其他地区分布的19个云杉属物种83个个体进行了物种鉴别分辨率的评价。研究结果显示单个的叶绿体DNA片段（10.5%~26.3%）和核DNA片段（15.8%~26.3%）对云杉属物种鉴别的分辨率较低，组合的叶绿体DNA片段的分辨能力（15.8%~42.1%）虽然高于单个DNA片段，但分辨率最高的trnHpsbA+trnStrnG和trnStrnG+trnLtrnF两个组合也只能达到42.1%；组合的核DNA片段（26.3%~36.8%）一样对云杉属物种鉴别存在困难。但是叶绿体DNA片段和核DNA片段的组合可以明显提高对云杉属物种鉴定的分辨率，尤其是trnStrnG+trnLtrnF+4Cl的组合片段，其分辨率可达到57.9%。因此在将来利用DNA条形码鉴别物种时，在常规DNA条形码片段不起作用的情况下，可采用这种叶绿体DNA片段和核DNA片段组合的方法来鉴定和区分植物物种。

关键词: 云杉属, DNA条形码, 核DNA片段, 物种鉴别

Abstract:

Spruces (Picea), a genus of Pinaceae, are important components of the forests in the Northern Hemisphere. It is relatively difficult to distinguish species by using traditional morphological method due to frequent interspecific hybridization and introgression, and radiative diversification. However, the emerging and developing of the DNA barcoding methods provide an alternative approach. In this study, we tested the discrimination powers between five chloroplast DNA regions (matK, rbcL, trnHpsbA, trnLtrnF and trnStrnG), three nuclear DNA regions (4CL, Sb29 and GI) and the combination of these fragments in spruces. We sampled 83 trees, which represent 19 spruce species mainly from QinghaiTibetan Plateau and also from other regions of China. We used two methods, PWGdistance and TreeBuilding, to conduct barcoding analsyes. A single chloroplast DNA fragment (10.5%-26.3%) or a single nuclear DNA fragment (15.8%-26.3%) always shows low level of species discrimination rate. Although the combination of the chloroplast DNA fragments had higher discrimination rate than the single one, the highest rate of discrimination was only 42.1% for both combinations of trnHpsbA+trnStrnG and trnStrnG+trnLtrnF. And the combination of the nuclear DNA fragments also showed lower rates of discrimination (26.3%-36.8%). It thus appears that it is difficult to discriminate spruce species using only chloroplast DNA fragments or nuclear DNA regions. However, the combination of chloroplast and nuclear DNA regions had higher resolution for identifying spruce species, especially for trnStrnG+trnLtrnF+4Cl, whose discrimination rate can reach up to 57.9%. Therefore, in the future, this combination of fragments from chloroplast and nuclear can be widely adopted for the discrimination of plant species when the normal DNA barcodes fail to work.

中图分类号:

Q 949
Q 75

邹嘉宾, 王茜, 李丽丽, 刘建全. 结合叶绿体和核DNA序列变异可提高云杉属物种的分子鉴别率[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 375-385.

ZOU Jia-Bin, WANG Qian, LI Li-Li, LIU Jian-Quan. The Combination of Chloroplast and Nuclear DNA Fragments Could Improve the Discrimination Power for Barcoding Spruce (Picea) Species[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(3): 375-385.

参考文献

CBOL Plant Working Group, 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (31): 12794—12797
Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M et al., 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: shortterm and longterm goals［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360 (1462): 1889—1895Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM et al., 2007. A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants［J］. Taxon, 56 (2): 295—299Chase MW, Fay MF, 2009. Barcoding of plants and fungi［J］. Science, 325: 682—683Cho Y, Mower JP, Qiu YL et al., 2004. Mitochondrial substitution rates are extraordinarily elevated and variable in a genus of flowering plants［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 (51): 17741—17746Chen J, Kllman T, Gyllenstrand N et al., 2010. New insights on the speciation history and nucleotide diversity of three boreal spruce species and a Tertiary relict［J］. Heredity, 104 (1): 3—14Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress WJ et al., 2006. 300,000 species to identify: problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants［J］. Taxon, 55 (3): 611—616Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue［J］. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19: 11—15Du FK, Peng XL, Liu JQ et al., 2011. Direction and extent of organelle DNA introgression between two spruce species in the QinghaiTibetan Plateau［J］. New Phytologist, 192: 1024—1033Farjón A, 2001. World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers［M］. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, UKFazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR et al., 2008. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well［J］. PLoS ONE, 3 (7): e2802
Fazekes AJ, Kesanakurti PR, Burgess KS et al., 2009. Are plant species inherently harder to discriminate than animal species using DNA barcoding markers? ［J］. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9 (Supp1.1): 130—139
Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N et al., 2009. Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants［J］. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 159 (1): 1—11
Fu L, Li N, Mill RR, 1999. Picea［A］. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (eds.), Flora of China［M］. Beijing: Science Press; S t. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 1 (4): 25—32
Hamilton M, 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation［J］. Molecular Ecology, 8 (3): 512—523
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL et al., 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes［J］. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270: 313—321
Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS et al., 2004. Identification of birds through DNA Barcodes［J］. PLoS Biology, 2 (10): e312
Heuertz M, Paoli ED, Kllman T et al., 2006. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce ［Picea abies (L.) Karst］［J］. Gene
tics, 174 (4): 2095—2105
Hollingsworth PM, 2011. Refining the DNA barcode for land plants［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Uni
ted States of America, 108 (49): 19451—19452
Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP, 2011. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode［J］. PLoS ONE, 6: e19254
Ivanova NV, Fazekas AJ, Hebert PDN, 2008. Semiautomated, membranebased protocol for DNA isolation from plants［J］. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 26 (3):186—198
Kan XZ, Wang SS, Ding X et al., 2007. Structural evolution of nrDNA ITS in Pinaceae and its phylogenetic implications［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44 (2): 765—777
Kerr KC, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ et al., 2007. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds［J］. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7: 535—543
Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA et al., 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (23): 8369—8374
Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J et al., 2008. MEGA: A biologistcentric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequence［J］. Brief Bioinform, 9 (4): 299—306
Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D et al., 2008. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (8): 2923—2928
Li Y, Stocks M, Hemmil S et al., 2010. Demographic histories of four spruce (Picea) species of the QinghaiTibetan Plateau and neighboring areas inferred from multiple nuclear loci［J］. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27 (5): 1001—1014
Li DZ, Gao LM, Li HT et al., 2011. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (49): 19641—19646
Librado P, Rozas J, 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data［J］. Bioinformatics, 25 (11): 1451—1452
Palmer JD, Herbon LA, 1988. Plant mitochondrial DNA evolves rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence［J］. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 28: 87—97
Pennisi E, 2007. Taxonomy. Wanted: a barcode for plants［J］. Science, 318: 190—191
Perry DJ, Bousquet J, 1998. Sequencetaggedsite (STS) markers of arbitrary genes: development, characterization and analysis of linkage in black spruce［J］. Genetics, 149 (2): 1089—1098
Ran JH, Wang PP, Zhao HJ et al., 2010. A test of seven candidate barcode regions from the plastome in Picea (Pinaceae) ［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 52 (12): 1109—1126
Ran JH, Wei XX, Wang XQ et al., 2006. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Picea (Pinaceae): Implication for phylogeographical studies using cytoplasmic haplotypes［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41: 405—419
Sang T,Crawford DJ,Stuessy TF,1997.Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae) ［J］.American Journal of Botany,84 (8): 1120—1136
Smith MA, Poyarkov NA, Hebert PDN, 2008. CO1 DNA barcoding amphibians: take the chance, meet the challenge［J］. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8: 235—246
Syring J, Farrell K, Businsky R et al., 2007. Widespread genealogical nonmonophyly in species of Pinus subgenus strobes［J］. Systematic Biology, 56 (2): 163—181
Syring J, Willyard A, Cronn R et al., 2005. Evolutionary relationships among Pinus (Pinaceae) subsections inferred from multiple lowcopy nuclear loci［J］. American Journal of Botany, 92 (12): 2086—2100
Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G et al., 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA［J］. Plant Molecular Biology, 17 (5): 1105—1109
Tate JA, Simpson BB, 2003. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species［J］. Systematic Botany, 28 (4): 723—737
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F et al., 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools［J］. Nucleic acids research, 25 (24): 4876—4882
Vences M, Thomas M, Bonett RM et al., 2005. Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges［J］. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360: 1859—1868
Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN, 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes［J］. Journal of Fish Biology, 74 (2): 329—356
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH et al., 2005. DNA barcoding Australia′s fish species［J］. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360: 1847—1857
Willyard A, Cronn R, Liston A, 2009. Reticulate evolution and incomplete lineage sorting among the ponderosa pines［J］. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52: 498—511
Zou JB, Peng XL, Li L et al., 2012. Molecular phylogeography and evolutionary history of Picea likiangensis in the QinghaiTibetan Plateau inferred from mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA sequence variation［J］. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 50 (4): 341—350

[1]	何维颖1、2、3, 潘跃芝1、2. 菊科橐吾属植物的DNA条形码研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2015, 37(06): 693-703.
[2]	曾春霞, 贺正山, 杨俊波. 应用DNA条形码对植物标本的核查[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 693-700.
[3]	陈之端1**, 李德铢2. 生命条形码与生命之树[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 675-681.
[4]	刘珉璐1、2, 郁文彬1, 王红1. 植物物种的快速鉴定与iFlora: DNA条形码在马先蒿属中的应用[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 707-714.
[5]	焦丽娟1、2, 税玉民1. 中国秋海棠属 (秋海棠科) 植物的DNA条形码评价[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 715-724.
[6]	李艳春, 吴刚, 杨祝良. 我国云南食用牛肝菌的DNA条形码研究[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 725-732.
[7]	卢孟孟1、2, 慈秀芹1、2, 杨国平1, 李捷1. 亚热带森林乔木树种DNA条形码研究——以哀牢山自然保护区为例[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 733-741.
[8]	张玉霄1、2, 许宇星4, 马朋飞1、2, 张丽娜1、2、3, 李德铢1、2. 竹亚科叶绿体DNA条形码筛选[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 743-750.
[9]	李燕1、2, 吴丁3, 高连明1. 裸子植物DNA条形码ITS2高通用性引物的筛选[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 751-760.
[10]	罗亚皇1、2、3、4, 刘杰1, 高连明1**, 李德铢1、2. DNA条形码在生态学研究中的应用与展望[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 761-768.
[11]	唐敏1, 伊廷双2, 王欣1, 谭美华1, 周欣1. Metabarcoding技术在植物鉴定和多样性研究中的应用[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 769-773.
[12]	马莉萍1, 伊廷双2, 左显维1, 张彪1, 李云霞1, 韩根亮1. 构建基于磁珠微流控芯片的iFlora遗传信息高效获取系统[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(6): 779-783.
[13]	欧阳铖人1、2, 孙航2, 李志敏1**, 张建文2. DNA条形码在中国金合欢属中的应用[J]. Plant Diversity, 2013, 35(5): 547-554.
[14]	庄会富, 王雨华. iFlora科技领域云的建设构想[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(6): 623-630.
[15]	蔡箐, 唐丽萍, 杨祝良. 大型经济真菌的DNA条形码研究——以我国剧毒鹅膏为例[J]. Plant Diversity, 2012, 34(6): 614-622.